Quality assessment of colonoscopy reporting: Results from a statewide cancer screening program

Jun Li, Marion R. Nadel, Carolyn F. Poppell, Diane M. Dwyer, David A. Lieberman, Eileen K. Steinberger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations


This paper aimed to assess quality of colonoscopy reports and determine if physicians in practice were already documenting recommended quality indicators, prior to the publication of a standardized Colonoscopy Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS) in 2007. We examined 110 colonoscopy reports from 2005-2006 through Maryland Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. We evaluated 25 key data elements recommended by CO-RADS, including procedure indications, risk/comorbidity assessments, procedure technical descriptions, colonoscopy findings, specimen retrieval/pathology. Among 110 reports, 73 documented the bowel preparation quality and 82 documented specific cecal landmarks. For the 177 individual polyps identified, information on size and morphology was documented for 87 and 53, respectively. Colonoscopy reporting varied considerately in the pre-CO-RADS period. The absence of key data elements may impact the ability to make recommendations for recall intervals. This paper provides baseline data to assess if CO-RADS has an impact on reporting and how best to improve the quality of reporting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number419796
JournalDiagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy
StatePublished - 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging


Dive into the research topics of 'Quality assessment of colonoscopy reporting: Results from a statewide cancer screening program'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this