TY - JOUR
T1 - Race, ethnicity, and considerations for data collection and analysis in research studies
AU - Sharghi, Sima
AU - Khalatbari, Shokoufeh
AU - Laird, Amy
AU - Lapidus, Jodi
AU - Enders, Felicity T.
AU - Meinzen-Derr, Jareen
AU - Tapia, Amanda L.
AU - Ciolino, Jody D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Association for Clinical and Translational Science.
PY - 2024/10/29
Y1 - 2024/10/29
N2 - Research studies involving human subjects require collection of and reporting on demographic data related to race and ethnicity. However, existing practices lack standardized guidelines, leading to misrepresentation and biased inferences and conclusions for underrepresented populations in research studies. For instance, sometimes there is a misconception that self-reported racial or ethnic identity may be treated as a biological variable with underlying genetic implications, overlooking its role as a social construct reflecting lived experiences of specific populations. In this manuscript, we use the We All Count data equity framework, which organizes data projects across seven stages: Funding, Motivation, Project Design, Data Collection, Analysis, Reporting, and Communication. Focusing on data collection and analysis, we use examples – both real and hypothetical – to review common practice and provide critiques and alternative recommendations. Through these examples and recommendations, we hope to provide the reader with some ideas and a starting point as they consider embedding a lens of justice, equity, diversity, and inclusivity from research conception to dissemination of findings.
AB - Research studies involving human subjects require collection of and reporting on demographic data related to race and ethnicity. However, existing practices lack standardized guidelines, leading to misrepresentation and biased inferences and conclusions for underrepresented populations in research studies. For instance, sometimes there is a misconception that self-reported racial or ethnic identity may be treated as a biological variable with underlying genetic implications, overlooking its role as a social construct reflecting lived experiences of specific populations. In this manuscript, we use the We All Count data equity framework, which organizes data projects across seven stages: Funding, Motivation, Project Design, Data Collection, Analysis, Reporting, and Communication. Focusing on data collection and analysis, we use examples – both real and hypothetical – to review common practice and provide critiques and alternative recommendations. Through these examples and recommendations, we hope to provide the reader with some ideas and a starting point as they consider embedding a lens of justice, equity, diversity, and inclusivity from research conception to dissemination of findings.
KW - analysis
KW - data collection
KW - ethnicity
KW - generalizability
KW - Race
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207952104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85207952104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/cts.2024.632
DO - 10.1017/cts.2024.632
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85207952104
SN - 2059-8661
VL - 8
JO - Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
JF - Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
IS - 1
M1 - e182
ER -