TY - JOUR
T1 - Randomised controlled trial of sugammadex or neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular block on the incidence of pulmonary complications in older adults undergoing prolonged surgery
AU - Togioka, Brandon M.
AU - Yanez, David
AU - Aziz, Michael F.
AU - Higgins, Janna R.
AU - Tekkali, Praveen
AU - Treggiari, Miriam M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank the anaesthesiology providers at OHSU for their support during the trial implementation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 British Journal of Anaesthesia
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - Background: Residual neuromuscular block has been associated with postoperative pulmonary complications. We hypothesised that sugammadex reduces postoperative pulmonary complications in patients aged ≥70 yr having surgery ≥3 h, compared with neostigmine. Methods: Patients were enrolled in an open-label, assessor-blinded, randomised, controlled trial. At surgical closure, subjects were equally randomised to receive sugammadex 2 mg kg−1 or neostigmine 0.07 mg kg−1 (maximum 5 mg) for rocuronium reversal. The primary endpoint was incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. Secondary endpoints included residual paralysis (train-of-four ratio <0.9 in the PACU) and Phase 1 recovery (time to attain pain control and stable respiratory, haemodynamic, and neurological status). The analysis was by intention-to-treat. Results: Of the 200 subjects randomised, 98 received sugammadex and 99 received neostigmine. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of postoperative pulmonary complications despite a signal towards reduced incidence for sugammadex (33% vs 40%; odds ratio [OR]=0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]=[0.40, 1.37]; P=0.30) compared with neostigmine. Sugammadex decreased residual neuromuscular block (10% vs 49%; OR=0.11, 95% CI=[0.04, 0.25]; P<0.001). Phase 1 recovery time was comparable between sugammadex (97.3 min [standard deviation, SD=54.3]) and neostigmine (110.0 min [SD=62.0]), difference –12.7 min (95% CI, [–29.2, 3.9], P=0.13). In an exploratory analysis, there were fewer 30 day hospital readmissions in the sugammadex group compared with the neostigmine group (5% vs 15%; OR=0.30, 95% CI=[0.08, 0.91]; P=0.03). Conclusions: In older adults undergoing prolonged surgery, sugammadex was associated with a 40% reduction in residual neuromuscular block, a 10% reduction in 30 day hospital readmission rate, but no difference in the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications. Based on this exploratory study, larger studies should determine whether sugammadex may reduce postoperative pulmonary complications and 30 day hospital readmissions. Clinical trial registration: NCT02861131.
AB - Background: Residual neuromuscular block has been associated with postoperative pulmonary complications. We hypothesised that sugammadex reduces postoperative pulmonary complications in patients aged ≥70 yr having surgery ≥3 h, compared with neostigmine. Methods: Patients were enrolled in an open-label, assessor-blinded, randomised, controlled trial. At surgical closure, subjects were equally randomised to receive sugammadex 2 mg kg−1 or neostigmine 0.07 mg kg−1 (maximum 5 mg) for rocuronium reversal. The primary endpoint was incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. Secondary endpoints included residual paralysis (train-of-four ratio <0.9 in the PACU) and Phase 1 recovery (time to attain pain control and stable respiratory, haemodynamic, and neurological status). The analysis was by intention-to-treat. Results: Of the 200 subjects randomised, 98 received sugammadex and 99 received neostigmine. There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of postoperative pulmonary complications despite a signal towards reduced incidence for sugammadex (33% vs 40%; odds ratio [OR]=0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]=[0.40, 1.37]; P=0.30) compared with neostigmine. Sugammadex decreased residual neuromuscular block (10% vs 49%; OR=0.11, 95% CI=[0.04, 0.25]; P<0.001). Phase 1 recovery time was comparable between sugammadex (97.3 min [standard deviation, SD=54.3]) and neostigmine (110.0 min [SD=62.0]), difference –12.7 min (95% CI, [–29.2, 3.9], P=0.13). In an exploratory analysis, there were fewer 30 day hospital readmissions in the sugammadex group compared with the neostigmine group (5% vs 15%; OR=0.30, 95% CI=[0.08, 0.91]; P=0.03). Conclusions: In older adults undergoing prolonged surgery, sugammadex was associated with a 40% reduction in residual neuromuscular block, a 10% reduction in 30 day hospital readmission rate, but no difference in the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications. Based on this exploratory study, larger studies should determine whether sugammadex may reduce postoperative pulmonary complications and 30 day hospital readmissions. Clinical trial registration: NCT02861131.
KW - acetylcholinesterase inhibitor
KW - cyclodextrin
KW - neostigmine
KW - neuromuscular block
KW - pulmonary complications
KW - rocuronium
KW - sugammadex
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080969472&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85080969472&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bja.2020.01.016
DO - 10.1016/j.bja.2020.01.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 32139135
AN - SCOPUS:85080969472
SN - 0007-0912
VL - 124
SP - 553
EP - 561
JO - British journal of anaesthesia
JF - British journal of anaesthesia
IS - 5
ER -