TY - JOUR
T1 - Remote testing for psychological and physiological acoustics
T2 - 179th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, ASA 2020
AU - Ellen Peng, Z.
AU - Buss, Emily
AU - Shen, Yi
AU - Bharadwaj, Hari
AU - Christopher Stecker, G.
AU - Beim, Jordan A.
AU - Bosen, Adam K.
AU - Braza, Meredith
AU - Diedesch, Anna C.
AU - Dorey, Claire M.
AU - Dykstra, Andrew R.
AU - Freyman, Richard
AU - Gallun, Frederick J.
AU - Goldsworthy, Raymond L.
AU - Gray, Lincoln
AU - Hoover, Eric C.
AU - Ihlefeld, Antje
AU - Koelewijn, Thomas
AU - Kopun, Judy G.
AU - Mesik, Juraj
AU - Richards, Virginia
AU - Shub, Daniel E.
AU - Venezia, Jonathan H.
AU - Waz, Sebastian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Acoustical Society of America.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Acoustics research involving human participants typically takes place in specialized laboratory settings. Lis-tening studies, for example, may present controlled sounds using calibrated transducers in sound-attenuating or anechoic chambers. In contrast, remote testing takes place away from the lab, in natural settings or in participants’ homes. Remote testing could provide greater access to participants, larger sample sizes, and enhanced ecological validity, at the cost of reduced acoustical control, less precise calibration, and incon-sistency of participant experiences. The ASA Technical Committee on Psychological and Physiological Acoustics (P&P) launched the Task Force on Remote Testing in May 2020, with goals of (1) surveying ap-proaches and platforms available to support remote testing by ASA members, (2) identifying challenges and considerations for prospective investigators, and (3) communicating this information via online resources, papers, and presentations. Longer-term goals include identifying best practices and providing resources for evaluating outcomes of remote testing, e.g. via peer review.
AB - Acoustics research involving human participants typically takes place in specialized laboratory settings. Lis-tening studies, for example, may present controlled sounds using calibrated transducers in sound-attenuating or anechoic chambers. In contrast, remote testing takes place away from the lab, in natural settings or in participants’ homes. Remote testing could provide greater access to participants, larger sample sizes, and enhanced ecological validity, at the cost of reduced acoustical control, less precise calibration, and incon-sistency of participant experiences. The ASA Technical Committee on Psychological and Physiological Acoustics (P&P) launched the Task Force on Remote Testing in May 2020, with goals of (1) surveying ap-proaches and platforms available to support remote testing by ASA members, (2) identifying challenges and considerations for prospective investigators, and (3) communicating this information via online resources, papers, and presentations. Longer-term goals include identifying best practices and providing resources for evaluating outcomes of remote testing, e.g. via peer review.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106158775&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85106158775&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1121/2.0001409
DO - 10.1121/2.0001409
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85106158775
SN - 1939-800X
VL - 42
JO - Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics
JF - Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics
IS - 1
M1 - 050009
Y2 - 7 December 2020 through 11 December 2020
ER -