Resin to metal bond strengths using two commercial systems.

L. G. Rothfuss; S. D. Hokett; S. O. Hondrum; C. W. Elrod

doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70236-7

Resin to metal bond strengths using two commercial systems.

L. G. Rothfuss, S. D. Hokett, S. O. Hondrum, C. W. Elrod

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: A secure bond between resin and an alloy framework is necessary for clinical success in removable prosthodontics. PURPOSE: This study compared the shear bond strength of composite to composite to metal with two commercially available chemical bonding systems: a silicoating system (Silicoater) and a nitrogenous heterocycle-acrylonitrile system (Kevloc). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-two nickel-chromium cubes were cast and composite resin was bonded to the alloy surfaces according to manufacturer's directions. After storage at 35 degrees C for 15 days, and thermocycling at 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C for 1200 cycles, the bonds were fractured in shear on a universal testing machine. RESULTS: Mean bond strength for the silicoated sample was 10.93 MPa and for the heterocycle-acrylnitrate system 11.44 MPa. An unpaired t test revealed no difference between the groups (p = 0.60). Visual inspection of the fracture surfaces revealed that failure was adhesive at the resin-to-metal surface in almost all the specimens.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	270-272
Number of pages	3
Journal	The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume	79
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70236-7
State	Published - Mar 1998
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Oral Surgery

Access to Document

10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70236-7

Cite this

@article{0f1c7cf2470b42c59398d21f0df40b4c,

title = "Resin to metal bond strengths using two commercial systems.",

abstract = "STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: A secure bond between resin and an alloy framework is necessary for clinical success in removable prosthodontics. PURPOSE: This study compared the shear bond strength of composite to composite to metal with two commercially available chemical bonding systems: a silicoating system (Silicoater) and a nitrogenous heterocycle-acrylonitrile system (Kevloc). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-two nickel-chromium cubes were cast and composite resin was bonded to the alloy surfaces according to manufacturer's directions. After storage at 35 degrees C for 15 days, and thermocycling at 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C for 1200 cycles, the bonds were fractured in shear on a universal testing machine. RESULTS: Mean bond strength for the silicoated sample was 10.93 MPa and for the heterocycle-acrylnitrate system 11.44 MPa. An unpaired t test revealed no difference between the groups (p = 0.60). Visual inspection of the fracture surfaces revealed that failure was adhesive at the resin-to-metal surface in almost all the specimens.",

author = "Rothfuss, {L. G.} and Hokett, {S. D.} and Hondrum, {S. O.} and Elrod, {C. W.}",

year = "1998",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70236-7",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "79",

pages = "270--272",

journal = "The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry",

issn = "0022-3913",

publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resin to metal bond strengths using two commercial systems.

AU - Rothfuss, L. G.

AU - Hokett, S. D.

AU - Hondrum, S. O.

AU - Elrod, C. W.

PY - 1998/3

Y1 - 1998/3

N2 - STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: A secure bond between resin and an alloy framework is necessary for clinical success in removable prosthodontics. PURPOSE: This study compared the shear bond strength of composite to composite to metal with two commercially available chemical bonding systems: a silicoating system (Silicoater) and a nitrogenous heterocycle-acrylonitrile system (Kevloc). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-two nickel-chromium cubes were cast and composite resin was bonded to the alloy surfaces according to manufacturer's directions. After storage at 35 degrees C for 15 days, and thermocycling at 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C for 1200 cycles, the bonds were fractured in shear on a universal testing machine. RESULTS: Mean bond strength for the silicoated sample was 10.93 MPa and for the heterocycle-acrylnitrate system 11.44 MPa. An unpaired t test revealed no difference between the groups (p = 0.60). Visual inspection of the fracture surfaces revealed that failure was adhesive at the resin-to-metal surface in almost all the specimens.

AB - STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: A secure bond between resin and an alloy framework is necessary for clinical success in removable prosthodontics. PURPOSE: This study compared the shear bond strength of composite to composite to metal with two commercially available chemical bonding systems: a silicoating system (Silicoater) and a nitrogenous heterocycle-acrylonitrile system (Kevloc). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-two nickel-chromium cubes were cast and composite resin was bonded to the alloy surfaces according to manufacturer's directions. After storage at 35 degrees C for 15 days, and thermocycling at 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C for 1200 cycles, the bonds were fractured in shear on a universal testing machine. RESULTS: Mean bond strength for the silicoated sample was 10.93 MPa and for the heterocycle-acrylnitrate system 11.44 MPa. An unpaired t test revealed no difference between the groups (p = 0.60). Visual inspection of the fracture surfaces revealed that failure was adhesive at the resin-to-metal surface in almost all the specimens.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032017936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032017936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70236-7

DO - 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70236-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 9553878

AN - SCOPUS:0032017936

SN - 0022-3913

VL - 79

SP - 270

EP - 272

JO - The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

JF - The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

IS - 3

ER -

Resin to metal bond strengths using two commercial systems.

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this