Revision der CEAP-klassifizierung für chronische venenleiden: Consensus statement

Translated title of the contribution: Revised CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: Consensus statement

Bo Eklöf, R. B. Rutherford, J. J. Bergan, P. H. Carpentier, P. Gloviczki, R. L. Kistner, M. H. Meissner, G. L. Moneta, K. Myers, F. T. Padberg, M. Perrin, C. Y. Ruckley, P. Coleridge Smith, T. W. Wakefield

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

The CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders (CVD) was developed in 1994 by an international ad hoc committee of the American Venous Forum, endorsed by the Society for Vascular Surgery, and incorporated into "Reporting Standards in Venous Disease" in 1995. Today most published clinical papers use all or portions of CEAP. Rather than have it stand as a static classification system, an ad hoc committee of the American Venous Forum, working with an international liaison committee, has recommended a number of practical changes, detailed in this consensus report. These include refinement of several definitions used in describing CVD; refinement of the C classes of CEAP; addition of the descriptor n (no venous abnormality identified); elaboration of the date of classification and level of investigation; and as a simpler alternative to the full (advanced) CEAP classification, introduction of a basic CEAP version. It is important to stress that CEAP is a descriptive classification, whereas venous severity scoring and quality of life scores are instruments for longitudinal research to assess outcomes.

Translated title of the contributionRevised CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: Consensus statement
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)220-225
Number of pages6
JournalPhlebologie
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005

Keywords

  • CEAP classification
  • Chronic venous disorders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Revised CEAP classification for chronic venous disorders: Consensus statement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this