Robotic pelvic organ prolapse surgery

Kamran P. Sajadi, Howard B. Goldman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations


Robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) has rapidly gained popularity over the past 10 years, owing to claims that it is associated with a reduced learning curve compared with standard laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) and that it has equal efficacy to the gold-standard treatment, abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC). The specifics of the surgical technique used for RSC vary widely, but the basic steps and principles are largely the same. Although complication rates are low, specific complications can be minimized by meticulous attention to surgical technique at several important points in the procedure. Multiple levels of evidence support the efficacy of RSC, and show that it is associated with a shorter hospital stay and convalescence than ASC. The learning curve for RSC usually comprises 10-20 procedures but for those with extensive experience of laparoscopy it is likely to be even shorter. RSC is more expensive than LSC but cheaper than ASC. As RSC has only been used for about a decade, we await long-term outcomes of more than a few years.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)216-224
Number of pages9
JournalNature Reviews Urology
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 10 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology


Dive into the research topics of 'Robotic pelvic organ prolapse surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this