Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Role of endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging in defining treatable intraprostatic tumor foci in prostate cancer: Quantitative analysis of imaging contour compared to whole-mount histopathology

  • Mekhail Anwar
  • , Antonio C. Westphalen
  • , Adam J. Jung
  • , Susan M. Noworolski
  • , Jeffry P. Simko
  • , John Kurhanewicz
  • , Mack Roach
  • , Peter R. Carroll
  • , Fergus V. Coakley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the role of endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging in defining the contour of treatable intraprostatic tumor foci in prostate cancer, since targeted therapy requires accurate target volume definition. Materials and methods We retrospectively identified 20 patients with prostate cancer who underwent endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging prior to radical prostatectomy and subsequent creation of detailed histopathological tumor maps from whole-mount step sections. Two experienced radiologists independently reviewed all MR images and electronically contoured all suspected treatable (≥0.5 cm3) tumor foci. Deformable co-registration in MATLAB was used to calculate the margin of error between imaging and histopathological contours at both capsular and non-capsular surfaces and the treatment margin required to ensure at least 95% tumor coverage. Results Histopathology showed 17 treatable tumor foci in 16 patients, of which 8 were correctly identified by both readers and an additional 2 were correctly identified by reader 2. For all correctly identified lesions, both readers accurately identified that tumor contacted the prostatic capsule, with no error in contour identification. On the non-capsular border, the median distance between the imaging and histopathological contour was 1.4 mm (range, 0-12). Expanding the contour by 5 mm at the non-capsular margin included 95% of tumor volume not initially covered within the MR contour. Conclusions Endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging can be used to accurately contour treatable intraprostatic tumor foci; adequate tumor coverage is achieved by expanding the treatment contour at the non-capsular margin by 5 mm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)303-308
Number of pages6
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume110
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014
Externally publishedYes

Funding

Work supported by NIH/NCRR/OD UCSF-CTSI Grant Number KL2 RR024130 (ACW) and NIH Grant Number 1S10RR028911-01 (FVC) and NIH Grant Number R01 CA148708 (SMN) and American Cancer Society Grant Number MRSG-CCE-05-087-01 (SMN). The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or of the American Cancer Society. FVC receives grant funding from General Electric and Insightec.

FundersFunder number
General Electric and Insightec
OD UCSF-CTSI1S10RR028911-01, R01 CA148708, KL2 RR024130
Author National Institutes of Health National Institutes of Health National Institutes of Health National Institutes of Health The Bev Hartig Huntington's Disease Foundation National Institutes of Health
American Cancer Society-Stanford Cancer InstituteMRSG-CCE-05-087-01
National Center for Research ResourcesS10RR028911

    Keywords

    • Dominant intraprostatic lesion
    • Dose escalation
    • Focal therapy
    • MRI
    • MRSI
    • Prostate cancer

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Hematology
    • Oncology
    • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Role of endorectal MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging in defining treatable intraprostatic tumor foci in prostate cancer: Quantitative analysis of imaging contour compared to whole-mount histopathology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this