TY - JOUR
T1 - Salvage hip arthroplasty after failed fixation of proximal femur fractures
AU - DeHaan, Alexander M.
AU - Groat, Tahnee
AU - Priddy, Michael
AU - Ellis, Thomas J.
AU - Duwelius, Paul J.
AU - Friess, Darin M.
AU - Mirza, Amer J.
PY - 2013/5/1
Y1 - 2013/5/1
N2 - We reviewed 46 patients who underwent salvage hip arthroplasty (SHA) for revision of failed cannulated screws (CS), sliding hip screws (SHS), or intramedullary nails (IMN). The primary objective was to determine differences in operative difficulty. SHA after failed femoral neck fixation was associated with lower intra-operative demands than after failed peri-trochanteric fractures. Similarly, analysis by the index implant found that conversion arthroplasty after failed CSs was associated with lower intra-operative morbidity than failed SHSs or IMNs; differences between SHS and IMN were not as clear. Importantly, intra-operative data in cases of failed SHSs were similar regardless of the original fracture type, showing the device played a larger role than the fracture pattern. Complications and revision surgery rates were similar regardless of fracture type or fixation device. Our results suggest that operative demands and subsequent patient morbidity are more dependent on the index device than the fracture pattern during SHA.
AB - We reviewed 46 patients who underwent salvage hip arthroplasty (SHA) for revision of failed cannulated screws (CS), sliding hip screws (SHS), or intramedullary nails (IMN). The primary objective was to determine differences in operative difficulty. SHA after failed femoral neck fixation was associated with lower intra-operative demands than after failed peri-trochanteric fractures. Similarly, analysis by the index implant found that conversion arthroplasty after failed CSs was associated with lower intra-operative morbidity than failed SHSs or IMNs; differences between SHS and IMN were not as clear. Importantly, intra-operative data in cases of failed SHSs were similar regardless of the original fracture type, showing the device played a larger role than the fracture pattern. Complications and revision surgery rates were similar regardless of fracture type or fixation device. Our results suggest that operative demands and subsequent patient morbidity are more dependent on the index device than the fracture pattern during SHA.
KW - Conversion hip arthroplasty
KW - Failed internal fixation
KW - Hip fracture
KW - Proximal femur fracture
KW - Revision hip arthroplasty
KW - Salvage hip arthroplasty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876738974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876738974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2012.10.027
DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2012.10.027
M3 - Article
C2 - 23489728
AN - SCOPUS:84876738974
SN - 0883-5403
VL - 28
SP - 855
EP - 859
JO - Journal of Arthroplasty
JF - Journal of Arthroplasty
IS - 5
ER -