TY - JOUR
T1 - Selective capture of radionuclides (U, Pu, Th, Am and Co) using functional nanoporous sorbents
AU - Yantasee, Wassana
AU - Fryxell, Glen E.
AU - Pattamakomsan, Kanda
AU - Sangvanich, Thanapon
AU - Wiacek, Robert J.
AU - Busche, Brad
AU - Addleman, Raymond S.
AU - Timchalk, Charles
AU - Ngamcherdtrakul, Worapol
AU - Siriwon, Natnaree
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID, R01AIO74064 ), the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS, R21ES015620 ), the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS, R01GM089918 ), the PNNL’s Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program, the Oregon Nanoscience and Microtechnologies Institute (ONAMI) , and OHSU’s Office of Vice President for Research (VPR) fund. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. The authors are grateful to Jeff Creim for his contribution.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/3/15
Y1 - 2019/3/15
N2 - This work evaluated sorbent materials created from nanoporous silica self-assembled with monolayer (SAMMS) of hydroxypyridinone derivatives (1,2-HOPO, 3,2-HOPO, 3,4-HOPO), acetamide phosphonate (Ac-Phos), glycine derivatives (IDAA, DE4A, ED3A), and thiol (SH) for capturing of actinides and transition metal cobalt. In filtered seawater doped with competing metals (Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn, Se, Mo) at levels encountered in environmental or physiological samples, 3,4-HOPO-SAMMS was best at capturing uranium (U(VI)) from pH 2–8, Ac-Phos and 1,2-HOPO-SAMMS sorbents were best at pH < 2. 3,4-HOPO-SAMMS effectively captured thorium (Th(IV)) and plutonium (239Pu(IV)) from pH 2–8, and americium (241Am(III)) from pH 5–8. Capturing cobalt (Co(II)) from filtered river water doped with competing metals (Cu, As, Ag, Cd, Hg, Tl, and Pb) was most effective from pH 5–8 with binding affinity ranged from IDAA > DE4A > ED3A > Ac-Phos > SH on SAMMS. Iminodiacetic acid (IDAA)-SAMMS was also outstanding at capturing Co(II) in ground and seawater. Within 5 min, over 99% of U(VI) and Co(II) in seawater was captured by 3,4-HOPO-SAMMS and IDAA-SAMMS, respectively. These nanoporous materials outperformed the commercially available cation sorbents in binding affinity and adsorption rate. They have great potential for water treatment and recovery of actinides and cobalt from complex matrices.
AB - This work evaluated sorbent materials created from nanoporous silica self-assembled with monolayer (SAMMS) of hydroxypyridinone derivatives (1,2-HOPO, 3,2-HOPO, 3,4-HOPO), acetamide phosphonate (Ac-Phos), glycine derivatives (IDAA, DE4A, ED3A), and thiol (SH) for capturing of actinides and transition metal cobalt. In filtered seawater doped with competing metals (Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn, Se, Mo) at levels encountered in environmental or physiological samples, 3,4-HOPO-SAMMS was best at capturing uranium (U(VI)) from pH 2–8, Ac-Phos and 1,2-HOPO-SAMMS sorbents were best at pH < 2. 3,4-HOPO-SAMMS effectively captured thorium (Th(IV)) and plutonium (239Pu(IV)) from pH 2–8, and americium (241Am(III)) from pH 5–8. Capturing cobalt (Co(II)) from filtered river water doped with competing metals (Cu, As, Ag, Cd, Hg, Tl, and Pb) was most effective from pH 5–8 with binding affinity ranged from IDAA > DE4A > ED3A > Ac-Phos > SH on SAMMS. Iminodiacetic acid (IDAA)-SAMMS was also outstanding at capturing Co(II) in ground and seawater. Within 5 min, over 99% of U(VI) and Co(II) in seawater was captured by 3,4-HOPO-SAMMS and IDAA-SAMMS, respectively. These nanoporous materials outperformed the commercially available cation sorbents in binding affinity and adsorption rate. They have great potential for water treatment and recovery of actinides and cobalt from complex matrices.
KW - Americium (Am)
KW - Cobalt (Co)
KW - Plutonium (Pu)
KW - Thorium (Th)
KW - Uranium (U)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058692040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058692040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.043
DO - 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.043
M3 - Article
C2 - 30580142
AN - SCOPUS:85058692040
SN - 0304-3894
VL - 366
SP - 677
EP - 683
JO - Journal of Hazardous Materials
JF - Journal of Hazardous Materials
ER -