TY - JOUR
T1 - Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA)
T2 - a multicentre, prospective cohort study
AU - iBRA Steering Group
AU - Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative
AU - Potter, Shelley
AU - Conroy, Elizabeth J.
AU - Cutress, Ramsey I.
AU - Williamson, Paula R.
AU - Whisker, Lisa
AU - Thrush, Steven
AU - Skillman, Joanna
AU - Barnes, Nicola L.P.
AU - Mylvaganam, Senthurun
AU - Teasdale, Elisabeth
AU - Jain, Abhilash
AU - Gardiner, Matthew D.
AU - Blazeby, Jane M.
AU - Holcombe, Chris
AU - Achuthan, R.
AU - Adwan, I.
AU - Aggarwal, S.
AU - Ahmed, M.
AU - Akelund, M.
AU - Akolekar, D.
AU - Al-Jibury, O.
AU - Amanita, M.
AU - Appleton, D.
AU - Archampong, D.
AU - Asgiersson, K.
AU - Athwal, R.
AU - Augusti, A.
AU - Ayaani, S.
AU - Bains, S.
AU - Baker, B.
AU - Baker, E.
AU - Baldota, S.
AU - Banerjee, D.
AU - Barker, S.
AU - Barr, L.
AU - Barry, P.
AU - Basu, N.
AU - Bathla, S.
AU - Bishop, N.
AU - Boland, G.
AU - Branford, O. A.
AU - Bright-Thomas, R.
AU - Brindle, R.
AU - Brock, L.
AU - Brown, V.
AU - Bux, F.
AU - Byrne, G.
AU - Cain, H.
AU - Caldon, L.
AU - Thomas, C.
N1 - Funding Information:
SP, CH, PRW, AJ, JMB, and LW report grants from NIHR Research for Patient Benefit Programme (see below) during the conduct of the study. SP and AJ report grants from the Association of Breast Surgery and the British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (see below). SP reports grants from NIHR Clinician Scientist Award and non-financial support from MRC ConDucT-II Hub, during the conduct of the study. The other authors have nothing to declare.
Funding Information:
This work was funded by an NIHR Research for Patient Benefit Programme Grant ( PB-PG-0214-33065 ) and pump-priming funding from the Association of Breast Surgery and the British Association of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. SP is an NIHR Clinician Scientist ( CS-2016-16-019 ). JMB is an NIHR Senior Investigator. This work was undertaken with the support of the MRC ConDuCT-II (Collaboration and innovation for Difficult and Complex randomised controlled Trials In Invasive procedures) Hub for Trials Methodology Research (MR/K025643/1) and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research, or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - Background: Use of biological or synthetic mesh might improve outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction—breast reconstruction with implants or expanders at the time of mastectomy—but there is a lack of high-quality evidence to support the safety or effectiveness of the technique. We aimed to establish the short-term safety of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction performed with and without mesh, to inform the feasibility of undertaking a future randomised clinical trial comparing different breast reconstruction techniques. Methods: In this prospective, multicentre cohort study, we consecutively recruited women aged 16 years or older who had any type of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction for malignancy or risk reduction, with any technique, at 81 participating breast and plastic surgical units in the UK. Data about patient demographics and operative, oncological, and complication details were collected before and after surgery. Outcomes of interest were implant loss (defined as unplanned removal of the expander or implant), infection requiring treatment with antibiotics or surgery, unplanned return to theatre, and unplanned re-admission to hospital for complications of reconstructive surgery, up to 3 months after reconstruction and assessed by clinical review or patient self-report. Follow-up is complete. The study is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, number ISRCTN37664281. Findings: Between Feb 1, 2014, and June 30, 2016, 2108 patients had 2655 mastectomies with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction at 81 units across the UK. 1650 (78%) patients had planned single-stage reconstructions (including 12 patients who had a different technique per breast). 1376 (65%) patients had reconstruction with biological (1133 [54%]) or synthetic (243 [12%]) mesh, 181 (9%) had non-mesh submuscular or subfascial implants, 440 (21%) had dermal sling implants, 42 (2%) had pre-pectoral implants, and 79 (4%) had other or a combination of implants. 3-month outcome data were available for 2081 (99%) patients. Of these patients, 182 (9%, 95% CI 8–10) experienced implant loss, 372 (18%, 16–20) required re-admission to hospital, and 370 (18%, 16–20) required return to theatre for complications within 3 months of their initial surgery. 522 (25%, 95% CI 23–27) patients required treatment for an infection. The rates of all of these complications are higher than those in the National Quality Standards (<5% for re-operation, re-admission, and implant loss, and <10% for infection). Interpretation: Complications after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction are higher than recommended by national standards. A randomised clinical trial is needed to establish the optimal approach to immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Funding: National Institute for Health Research, Association of Breast Surgery, and British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons.
AB - Background: Use of biological or synthetic mesh might improve outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction—breast reconstruction with implants or expanders at the time of mastectomy—but there is a lack of high-quality evidence to support the safety or effectiveness of the technique. We aimed to establish the short-term safety of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction performed with and without mesh, to inform the feasibility of undertaking a future randomised clinical trial comparing different breast reconstruction techniques. Methods: In this prospective, multicentre cohort study, we consecutively recruited women aged 16 years or older who had any type of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction for malignancy or risk reduction, with any technique, at 81 participating breast and plastic surgical units in the UK. Data about patient demographics and operative, oncological, and complication details were collected before and after surgery. Outcomes of interest were implant loss (defined as unplanned removal of the expander or implant), infection requiring treatment with antibiotics or surgery, unplanned return to theatre, and unplanned re-admission to hospital for complications of reconstructive surgery, up to 3 months after reconstruction and assessed by clinical review or patient self-report. Follow-up is complete. The study is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, number ISRCTN37664281. Findings: Between Feb 1, 2014, and June 30, 2016, 2108 patients had 2655 mastectomies with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction at 81 units across the UK. 1650 (78%) patients had planned single-stage reconstructions (including 12 patients who had a different technique per breast). 1376 (65%) patients had reconstruction with biological (1133 [54%]) or synthetic (243 [12%]) mesh, 181 (9%) had non-mesh submuscular or subfascial implants, 440 (21%) had dermal sling implants, 42 (2%) had pre-pectoral implants, and 79 (4%) had other or a combination of implants. 3-month outcome data were available for 2081 (99%) patients. Of these patients, 182 (9%, 95% CI 8–10) experienced implant loss, 372 (18%, 16–20) required re-admission to hospital, and 370 (18%, 16–20) required return to theatre for complications within 3 months of their initial surgery. 522 (25%, 95% CI 23–27) patients required treatment for an infection. The rates of all of these complications are higher than those in the National Quality Standards (<5% for re-operation, re-admission, and implant loss, and <10% for infection). Interpretation: Complications after immediate implant-based breast reconstruction are higher than recommended by national standards. A randomised clinical trial is needed to establish the optimal approach to immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. Funding: National Institute for Health Research, Association of Breast Surgery, and British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060871490&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060871490&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30781-2
DO - 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30781-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 30639093
AN - SCOPUS:85060871490
SN - 1470-2045
VL - 20
SP - 254
EP - 266
JO - The Lancet Oncology
JF - The Lancet Oncology
IS - 2
ER -