TY - JOUR
T1 - Social Care Recommendations in National Diabetes Treatment Guidelines
AU - Aceves, Benjamin
AU - Gunn, Rose
AU - Pisciotta, Maura
AU - Razon, Na’amah
AU - Cottrell, Erika
AU - Hessler, Danielle
AU - Gold, Rachel
AU - Gottlieb, Laura M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01MD014886. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funding body did not participate in the design of the study or the writing of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Purpose of Review: An expanding body of research documents associations between socioeconomic circumstances and health outcomes, which has led health care institutions to invest in new activities to identify and address patients’ social circumstances in the context of care delivery. Despite growing national investment in these “social care” initiatives, the extent to which social care activities are routinely incorporated into care for patients with type II diabetes mellitus (T2D), specifically, is unknown. We conducted a scoping review of existing T2D treatment and management guidelines to explore whether and how these guidelines incorporate recommendations that reflect social care practice categories. Recent Findings: We applied search terms to locate all T2D treatment and management guidelines for adults published in the US from 1977 to 2021. The search captured 158 national guidelines. We subsequently applied the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine framework to search each guideline for recommendations related to five social care activities: Awareness, Adjustment, Assistance, Advocacy, and Alignment. The majority of guidelines (122; 77%) did not recommend any social care activities. The remainder (36; 23%) referred to one or more social care activities. In the guidelines that referred to at least one type of social care activity, adjustments to medical treatment based on social risk were most common [34/36 (94%)]. Summary: Recommended adjustments included decreasing medication costs to accommodate financial strain, changing literacy level or language of handouts, and providing virtual visits to accommodate transportation insecurity. Ensuring that practice guidelines more consistently reflect social care best practices may improve outcomes for patients living with T2D.
AB - Purpose of Review: An expanding body of research documents associations between socioeconomic circumstances and health outcomes, which has led health care institutions to invest in new activities to identify and address patients’ social circumstances in the context of care delivery. Despite growing national investment in these “social care” initiatives, the extent to which social care activities are routinely incorporated into care for patients with type II diabetes mellitus (T2D), specifically, is unknown. We conducted a scoping review of existing T2D treatment and management guidelines to explore whether and how these guidelines incorporate recommendations that reflect social care practice categories. Recent Findings: We applied search terms to locate all T2D treatment and management guidelines for adults published in the US from 1977 to 2021. The search captured 158 national guidelines. We subsequently applied the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine framework to search each guideline for recommendations related to five social care activities: Awareness, Adjustment, Assistance, Advocacy, and Alignment. The majority of guidelines (122; 77%) did not recommend any social care activities. The remainder (36; 23%) referred to one or more social care activities. In the guidelines that referred to at least one type of social care activity, adjustments to medical treatment based on social risk were most common [34/36 (94%)]. Summary: Recommended adjustments included decreasing medication costs to accommodate financial strain, changing literacy level or language of handouts, and providing virtual visits to accommodate transportation insecurity. Ensuring that practice guidelines more consistently reflect social care best practices may improve outcomes for patients living with T2D.
KW - Diabetes
KW - Health disparities
KW - Social care
KW - Treatment guidelines
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137081692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85137081692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11892-022-01490-z
DO - 10.1007/s11892-022-01490-z
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36040537
AN - SCOPUS:85137081692
SN - 1534-4827
VL - 22
SP - 481
EP - 491
JO - Current Diabetes Reports
JF - Current Diabetes Reports
IS - 10
ER -