Abstract
In response to regulatory changes at the federal level, states that run their own marketplaces have taken steps to stabilize their individual markets. In this comparison of state-based and federally-facilitated marketplaces from 2016-2018, we find that SBMs had slower premium increases (43% vs. 75%), and fewer carrier exits, than FFMs. The total population participating in FFMs declined by 10%, while the enrolled population in SBMs remained largely stable, increasing by 2%. We find that the performance of the ACA marketplaces varies by state and appears to cluster around marketplace types.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-7 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | LDI issue brief |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| State | Published - Mar 1 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'State-Based Marketplaces Outperform Federally-Facilitated Marketplaces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS