Strategies and opportunities to STOP colon cancer in priority populations: Pragmatic pilot study design and outcomes

Gloria D. Coronado, William M. Vollmer, Amanda Petrik, Josue Aguirre, Tanya Kapka, Jennifer DeVoe, Jon Puro, Tran Miers, Jennifer Lembach, Ann Turner, Jennifer Sanchez, Sally Retecki, Christine Nelson, Beverly Green

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Colorectal-cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in the United States, and Latinos have particularly low rates of screening. Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations (STOP CRC) is a partnership among two research institutions and a network of safety net clinics to promote colorectal cancer screening among populations served by these clinics. This paper reports on results of a pilot study conducted in a safety net organization that serves primarily Latinos.Methods: The study assessed two clinic-based approaches to raise rates of colorectal-cancer screening among selected age-eligible patients not up-to-date with colorectal-cancer screening guidelines. One clinic each was assigned to: (1) an automated data-driven Electronic Health Record (EHR)-embedded program for mailing Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kits (Auto Intervention); or (2) a higher-intensity program consisting of a mailed FIT kit plus linguistically and culturally tailored interventions delivered at the clinic level (Auto Plus Intervention). A third clinic within the safety-net organization was selected to serve as a passive control (Usual Care). Two simple measurements of feasibility were: 1) ability to use real-time EHR data to identify patients eligible for each intervention step, and 2) ability to offer affordable testing and follow-up care for uninsured patients.Results: The study was successful at both measurements of feasibility. A total of 112 patients in the Auto clinic and 101 in the Auto Plus clinic met study inclusion criteria and were mailed an introductory letter. Reach was high for the mailed component (92.5% of kits were successfully mailed), and moderate for the telephone component (53% of calls were successful completed). After exclusions for invalid address and other factors, 206 (109 in the Auto clinic and 97 in the Auto Plus clinic) were mailed a FIT kit. At 6 months, fecal test completion rates were higher in the Auto (39.3%) and Auto Plus (36.6%) clinics compared to the usual-care clinic (1.1%).Conclusions: Findings showed that the trial interventions delivered in a safety-net setting were both feasible and raised rates of colorectal-cancer screening, compared to usual care. Findings from this pilot will inform a larger pragmatic study involving multiple clinics.Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT01742065.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number55
JournalBMC cancer
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 26 2014

Keywords

  • Colorectal cancer screening
  • Fecal testing
  • Federally qualified health center
  • Hispanics
  • Latinos
  • Pragmatic study
  • Safety net clinic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Genetics
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Strategies and opportunities to STOP colon cancer in priority populations: Pragmatic pilot study design and outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this