TY - JOUR
T1 - Sulfidation of Iron-Based Materials
T2 - A Review of Processes and Implications for Water Treatment and Remediation
AU - Fan, Dimin
AU - Lan, Ying
AU - Tratnyek, Paul G.
AU - Johnson, Richard L.
AU - Filip, Jan
AU - O'Carroll, Denis M.
AU - Nunez Garcia, Ariel
AU - Agrawal, Abinash
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based on work supported by the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program of the U.S. Department of Defense, Award Numbers ER-2308, ER-2620, and ER-2621, the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Fellowship, the Ontario Research FundResearch Excellence Program (Ontario, Canada) for the ORF-RE-WR01 Project Innovative, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Engage Program (Grant Number: 449311-14) and Czech Science Foundation (Grant Number GF17-33779L). Salary support was provided by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship to DMO and an NSERC Industrial Postgraduate Scholarship to ANG. This report has not been subject to review by any sponsor and therefore does not necessarily reflect agency views and no official endorsements should be inferred.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2017/11/21
Y1 - 2017/11/21
N2 - Iron-based materials used in water treatment and groundwater remediation - especially micro- and nanosized zerovalent iron (nZVI) - can be more effective when modified with lower-valent forms of sulfur (i.e., "sulfidated"). Controlled sulfidation for this purpose (using sulfide, dithionite, etc.) is the main topic of this review, but insights are derived by comparison with related and comparatively well-characterized processes such as corrosion of iron in sulfidic waters and abiotic natural attenuation by iron sulfide minerals. Material characterization shows that varying sulfidation protocols (e.g., concerted or sequential) and key operational variables (e.g., S/Fe ratio and sulfidation duration) result in materials with structures and morphologies ranging from core-shell to multiphase. A meta-analysis of available kinetic data for dechlorination under anoxic conditions, shows that sulfidation usually increases dechlorination rates, and simultaneously hydrogen production is suppressed. Therefore, sulfidation can greatly improve the efficiency of utilization of reducing equivalents for contaminant removal. This benefit is most likely due to inhibited corrosion as a result of sulfidation. Sulfidation may also favor desirable pathways of contaminant removal, such as (i) dechlorination by reductive elimination rather than hydrogenolysis and (ii) sequestration of metals as sulfides that could be resistant to reoxidation. Under oxic conditions, sulfidation is shown to enhance heterogeneous catalytic oxidation of contaminants. These net effects of sulfidation on contaminant removal by iron-based materials may substantially improve their practical utility for water treatment and remediation of contaminated groundwater.
AB - Iron-based materials used in water treatment and groundwater remediation - especially micro- and nanosized zerovalent iron (nZVI) - can be more effective when modified with lower-valent forms of sulfur (i.e., "sulfidated"). Controlled sulfidation for this purpose (using sulfide, dithionite, etc.) is the main topic of this review, but insights are derived by comparison with related and comparatively well-characterized processes such as corrosion of iron in sulfidic waters and abiotic natural attenuation by iron sulfide minerals. Material characterization shows that varying sulfidation protocols (e.g., concerted or sequential) and key operational variables (e.g., S/Fe ratio and sulfidation duration) result in materials with structures and morphologies ranging from core-shell to multiphase. A meta-analysis of available kinetic data for dechlorination under anoxic conditions, shows that sulfidation usually increases dechlorination rates, and simultaneously hydrogen production is suppressed. Therefore, sulfidation can greatly improve the efficiency of utilization of reducing equivalents for contaminant removal. This benefit is most likely due to inhibited corrosion as a result of sulfidation. Sulfidation may also favor desirable pathways of contaminant removal, such as (i) dechlorination by reductive elimination rather than hydrogenolysis and (ii) sequestration of metals as sulfides that could be resistant to reoxidation. Under oxic conditions, sulfidation is shown to enhance heterogeneous catalytic oxidation of contaminants. These net effects of sulfidation on contaminant removal by iron-based materials may substantially improve their practical utility for water treatment and remediation of contaminated groundwater.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035342052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035342052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.7b04177
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.7b04177
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29035566
AN - SCOPUS:85035342052
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 51
SP - 13070
EP - 13085
JO - Environmental Science and Technology
JF - Environmental Science and Technology
IS - 22
ER -