Taste dysfunction after endoscopic endonasal resection of olfactory groove meningioma: Case series and review of the literature

Adeline L. Fecker, Matt Studer, R. Peter Manes, Sacit Bulent Omay, Kara Detwiller, Timothy L. Smith, Peter Andersen, Olabisi Sanusi, Kelly Collins, Mathew Geltzeiler, Ryan A. Rimmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The incidence of ageusia and dysgeusia after endoscopic endonasal (EEA) resection of olfactory groove meningioma (OGM) is not well established despite recognized impairment in olfactory function. Methods: We retrospectively administered a validated taste and smell survey to patients undergoing EEA for resection of OGM at two institutions. Demographics and clinical characteristics were collected and survey responses were analyzed. Results: Twelve patients completed the survey. The median time from surgery was 24 months. The average total complaint score was 5.5 out of 16 [0–13]. All patients reported a change in sense of smell while only 42 % reported a change in sense of taste. Taste changes did not consistently associate with laterality or size of the neoplasm. Significant heterogeneity existed when rating severity of symptoms. Conclusions: To our knowledge this is the first case series examining taste changes after EEA resection of OGM. Despite universal olfactory dysfunction, only a minority of patients reported a change in their sense of taste. Our findings may improve patient counseling and expectations after surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number104302
JournalAmerican Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2024

Keywords

  • Endonasal
  • Meningioma
  • Olfactory groove meningioma
  • Quality of life
  • Sensory
  • Smell
  • Taste

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Taste dysfunction after endoscopic endonasal resection of olfactory groove meningioma: Case series and review of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this