TY - JOUR
T1 - The applicability of self-determination theory to health coaching
T2 - a qualitative analysis of patient experiences
AU - Denneson, Lauren M.
AU - Ono, Sarah S.
AU - Trevino, Amira Y.
AU - Kenyon, Emily
AU - Dobscha, Steven K.
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, and the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention project PRG-0-027-15. Dr. Denneson is a core investigator at the VA Portland Health Care System, HSR&D Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or United States government.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/7/2
Y1 - 2020/7/2
N2 - To examine the fit between core concepts of self-determination theory and patient experiences with health coaching, 18 participants at one large United States Veterans Affairs medical centre completed semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews (40–60 min) about their experiences with health coaching. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis, and self-determination theory concepts (autonomy, competence, relatedness, and self-integration) were applied to the data. Participant descriptions of their experiences with health coaching were consistent with the process of motivation and goal attainment proposed by self-determination theory. Participants felt the programme supported their sense of autonomy by helping them select goals that were important to them and recognising their ownership over outcomes. Competence was described as the ‘confidence’ to tackle any challenge and relatedness was discussed as a consistently strong rapport with the health coach. Participants spoke to self-integration by discussing their ability to maintain behaviour change beyond the coaching programme, with some explicitly making the connection between behaviours and their values and life purpose. This study provides initial support for the use of self-determination theory as a theoretical basis of health coaching. Support for patient autonomy, competence, and relatedness may be important components of health coaching practice.
AB - To examine the fit between core concepts of self-determination theory and patient experiences with health coaching, 18 participants at one large United States Veterans Affairs medical centre completed semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews (40–60 min) about their experiences with health coaching. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis, and self-determination theory concepts (autonomy, competence, relatedness, and self-integration) were applied to the data. Participant descriptions of their experiences with health coaching were consistent with the process of motivation and goal attainment proposed by self-determination theory. Participants felt the programme supported their sense of autonomy by helping them select goals that were important to them and recognising their ownership over outcomes. Competence was described as the ‘confidence’ to tackle any challenge and relatedness was discussed as a consistently strong rapport with the health coach. Participants spoke to self-integration by discussing their ability to maintain behaviour change beyond the coaching programme, with some explicitly making the connection between behaviours and their values and life purpose. This study provides initial support for the use of self-determination theory as a theoretical basis of health coaching. Support for patient autonomy, competence, and relatedness may be important components of health coaching practice.
KW - Health coaching
KW - behaviour change
KW - health promotion
KW - patient-centred care
KW - qualitative
KW - self-determination theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074017839&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074017839&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17521882.2019.1673457
DO - 10.1080/17521882.2019.1673457
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074017839
SN - 1752-1882
VL - 13
SP - 163
EP - 175
JO - Coaching
JF - Coaching
IS - 2
ER -