The impact of an ED-only full-capacity protocol

Taketo Watase, Rongwei Fu, Denise Foster, Denise Langley, Daniel A. Handel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of an emergency department (ED)-only full-capacity protocol and diversion, controlling for patient volumes and other potential confounding factors. Methods: This was a preintervention and postintervention cohort study using data 12 months before and 12 months after the implementation of the protocol. During the implementation period, attending physicians and charge nurses were educated with clear and simple figures on the criteria for the initiation of the new protocol. A multiple logistic regression model was used to compare ambulance diversion between the 2 periods. Results: The proportion of days when the ED went on diversion at least once during a 24-hour period was 60.4% during the preimplementation period and 20% in the postimplementation periods (P < .001). In the multivariate logistic regression model, the use of the new protocol was significantly associated with decreased odds of diversion rate in the postimplementation period (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.48). Conclusion: Our predivert/full-capacity protocol is a simple and generalizable strategy that can be implemented within the boundaries of the ED and is significantly associated with a decreased diversion rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1329-1335
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Issue number8
StatePublished - Oct 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of an ED-only full-capacity protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this