Abstract
Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a feared complication in pancreatic resection. Gravity drainage (GD) is hypothesized to reduce POPF versus closed-suction drainage (CSD). We sought to evaluate this theory. Methods: Six-hundred-twenty-nine patients undergoing pancreatic resection between 2013 and 2020 were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression for the outcomes of POPF and clinically-relevant POPF (crPOPF). Results: Three-hundred-ninety-seven patients (63.1%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and 232 (36.9%) underwent distal pancreatectomy. Suction drains were placed in 588 patients (93.5%) whereas 41 (6.5%) had GDs. One-hundred-twenty-five (27.6%) experienced a POPF; 49 (10%) crPOPFs. On multivariable analysis, suction drainage was not associated with increased risk of POPF (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.30–1.93, P = 0.57) or crPOPF (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.30–3.26, P = 0.98). Conclusion: Suction drainage does not promote POPF when compared to GDs. Drain type should be determined by surgeon preference, while taking into account nursing and patient-specific considerations especially when patients are discharged with drains.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 737-741 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | American journal of surgery |
Volume | 224 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 2022 |
Keywords
- Hepatobiliary
- Pancreas Resection
- Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula
- Surgical Drain
- Whipple
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery