Abstract
Background: The study was conducted to characterize the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and unintended pregnancy, contraceptive use patterns, and perceived fertility. Methods: This study employed a cross-sectional, nationally representative database (2002 National Survey of Family Growth). Unintended pregnancy was compared among BMI groups [normal (<25 m/kg2), overweight (25-30 m/kg2) and obese (>30 m/kg2)]. Analyses also evaluated the association between demographic, socioeconomic, behavioral and health-related variables and BMI. Multiple logistic regression with adjustment for sampling design was used to measure associations of interest. Results: BMI data were available from 6690 nonpregnant women. Of these, 3600 (53.6%) were normal weight, 1643 (25%) were overweight and 1447 (21.4%) were obese. Compared to women with normal BMIs, the risk of unintended pregnancy in the last 5 years did not differ among overweight [adjusted OR 0.95 (95% CI 0.77-1.17)] or obese [adjusted OR 0.87 (95% CI 0.70-1.09)] women. There were no differences in contraceptive use patterns or perceived fertility among BMI groups. Conclusion: Data from the 2002 NSFG do not support an association between obesity and unintended pregnancy.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 234-238 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Contraception |
| Volume | 77 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2008 |
Keywords
- BMI
- Contraceptive use
- Obesity
- Perceived fertility
- Unintended pregnancy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Reproductive Medicine
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The relationship between body mass index and unintended pregnancy: results from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS