TY - JOUR
T1 - The Transforming Outcomes for Patients Through Medical Home Evaluation and reDesign (TOPMED) Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Cost and Utilization Results
AU - Colasurdo, Joshua
AU - Pizzimenti, Christie
AU - Singh, Sumeet
AU - Ramsey, Katrina
AU - Ross, Rachel
AU - Sachdeva, Bhavaya
AU - Dorr, David A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number UL1TR0002369. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2022/2/1
Y1 - 2022/2/1
N2 - Background: Primary CareMedical Home (PCMH) redesign efforts are intended to enhance primary care's ability to improve population health and well-being. PCMH transformation that is focused on "high-value elements"(HVEs) for cost and utilization may improve effectiveness. Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine if a focus on achieving HVEs extracted from successful primary care transformation models would reduce cost and utilization as compared with a focus on achieving PCMH quality improvement goals. Research Design: A stratified, cluster randomized controlled trial with 2 arms. All practices received equal financial incentives, health information technology support, and in-person practice facilitation. Analyses consisted of multivariable modeling, adjusting for the cluster, with difference-in-difference results. Subjects: Eight primary care clinics that were engaged in PCMH reform. Measures: We examined: (1) total claims payments; (2) emergency department (ED) visits; and (3) hospitalizations among patients during baseline and intervention years. Results: In total, 16,099 patients met the inclusion criteria. Intervention clinics had significantly lower baseline ED visits (P=0.02) and claims paid (P=0.01). Difference-in-difference showed a decrease in ED visits greater in control than intervention (ED per 1000 patients: +56; 95% confidence interval: +96, +15) with a trend towards decreased hospitalizations in intervention (-15; 95% confidence interval: -52, +21). Costs were not different. In modeling monthly outcome means, the generalized linear mixed model showed significant differences for hospitalizations during the intervention year (P=0.03). Discussion: The trial had a trend of decreasing hospitalizations, increased ED visits, and no change in costs in the HVE versus quality improvement arms.
AB - Background: Primary CareMedical Home (PCMH) redesign efforts are intended to enhance primary care's ability to improve population health and well-being. PCMH transformation that is focused on "high-value elements"(HVEs) for cost and utilization may improve effectiveness. Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine if a focus on achieving HVEs extracted from successful primary care transformation models would reduce cost and utilization as compared with a focus on achieving PCMH quality improvement goals. Research Design: A stratified, cluster randomized controlled trial with 2 arms. All practices received equal financial incentives, health information technology support, and in-person practice facilitation. Analyses consisted of multivariable modeling, adjusting for the cluster, with difference-in-difference results. Subjects: Eight primary care clinics that were engaged in PCMH reform. Measures: We examined: (1) total claims payments; (2) emergency department (ED) visits; and (3) hospitalizations among patients during baseline and intervention years. Results: In total, 16,099 patients met the inclusion criteria. Intervention clinics had significantly lower baseline ED visits (P=0.02) and claims paid (P=0.01). Difference-in-difference showed a decrease in ED visits greater in control than intervention (ED per 1000 patients: +56; 95% confidence interval: +96, +15) with a trend towards decreased hospitalizations in intervention (-15; 95% confidence interval: -52, +21). Costs were not different. In modeling monthly outcome means, the generalized linear mixed model showed significant differences for hospitalizations during the intervention year (P=0.03). Discussion: The trial had a trend of decreasing hospitalizations, increased ED visits, and no change in costs in the HVE versus quality improvement arms.
KW - Chronic illness management
KW - Health care cost
KW - Health care utilization
KW - Primary Care Medical Home
KW - Primary care transformation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123653007&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123653007&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001660
DO - 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001660
M3 - Article
C2 - 35030564
AN - SCOPUS:85123653007
SN - 0025-7079
VL - 60
SP - 149
EP - 155
JO - Medical Care
JF - Medical Care
IS - 2
ER -