TY - JOUR
T1 - Thermoregulation and performance of heat-reinforced autoshaped keypecking in chicks
AU - Cunningham, Christopher L.
AU - Ostroff, Robert L.
AU - Harris, David F.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by Grant HD15308 awarded to James Metcalfe. Robert Fitzgerald is thanked for his helpful comments. Requests for reprints should be sent to C. L. Cunningham, Department of Medical Psychology (L470), Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR 97201.
PY - 1989/1
Y1 - 1989/1
N2 - Performance of autoshaped keypecking reinforced by heat was found to increase and then to decrease when chicks were exposed to training under a constant thermal load on a daily basis over the first 1-2 weeks after hatching. The decline in performance was not affected by variation in US duration (Experiment 1). No decline in performance was observed when food reinforcement was used (Experiment 2), suggesting that the effect depended on the use of thermal motivation. When thermoregulation was disrupted by pharmacological blockade using propranolol hydrochloride (10 mg/kg), keypecking was reinstated (Experiment 3). The increase in keypecking produced by propranolol was not due to a nonspecific energization of behavior inasmuch as the drug depressed autoshaped keypecking established with food reinforcement (Experiment 4). These findings support the conclusion that the decline in autoshaped keypecking reinforced by heat is due to development of the chick's thermoregulatory system. Various physical changes (e.g., feathering) and the increasing effectiveness of autonomic and behavioral thermoregulatory responses reduce the net motivational value of external heat sources, thus leading to a decline in the likelihood of approach and contact with signals for heat.
AB - Performance of autoshaped keypecking reinforced by heat was found to increase and then to decrease when chicks were exposed to training under a constant thermal load on a daily basis over the first 1-2 weeks after hatching. The decline in performance was not affected by variation in US duration (Experiment 1). No decline in performance was observed when food reinforcement was used (Experiment 2), suggesting that the effect depended on the use of thermal motivation. When thermoregulation was disrupted by pharmacological blockade using propranolol hydrochloride (10 mg/kg), keypecking was reinstated (Experiment 3). The increase in keypecking produced by propranolol was not due to a nonspecific energization of behavior inasmuch as the drug depressed autoshaped keypecking established with food reinforcement (Experiment 4). These findings support the conclusion that the decline in autoshaped keypecking reinforced by heat is due to development of the chick's thermoregulatory system. Various physical changes (e.g., feathering) and the increasing effectiveness of autonomic and behavioral thermoregulatory responses reduce the net motivational value of external heat sources, thus leading to a decline in the likelihood of approach and contact with signals for heat.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024585462&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024585462&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0163-1047(89)90660-2
DO - 10.1016/S0163-1047(89)90660-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 2705983
AN - SCOPUS:0024585462
SN - 1074-7427
VL - 51
SP - 54
EP - 72
JO - Communications in behavioral biology. Part A: [Original articles]
JF - Communications in behavioral biology. Part A: [Original articles]
IS - 1
ER -