TY - JOUR
T1 - Updated systematic review of exercise studies in breast cancer survivors
T2 - Attention to the principles of exercise training
AU - Neil-Sztramko, Sarah E.
AU - Winters-Stone, Kerri M.
AU - Bland, Kelcey A.
AU - Campbell, Kristin L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding SN-S is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Publisher Copyright:
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - Objectives To update our previous evaluation of the exercise interventions used in randomised controlled trials of breast cancer survivors in relation to (1) the application of the principles of exercise training in the exercise prescription; (2) the reporting of the components of the exercise prescription; and (3) the reporting of adherence of participants to the prescribed interventions. Design Systematic review. Data sources The OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus electronic databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2017. Eligibility criteria Randomised controlled trials of at least 4 weeks of aerobic and/or resistance exercise in women diagnosed with breast cancer, reporting on physical fitness or body composition outcomes. Results Specificity was appropriately applied by 84%, progression by 29%, overload by 38% and initial values by 67% of newly identified studies. Reversibility was reported by 3% anddiminishing returns by 22% of newly identified studies. No studies reported all components of the exercise prescription in the methods, or adherence to the prescribed intervention in the results. Reporting of reversibility has increased from 2010, but no other improvements in reporting were noted from the previous review. Summary/Conclusion No studies of exercise in women with breast cancer attended to all principles of exercise training, or reported all components of the exercise prescription in the methods, or adherence to the prescription in the results. Full reporting of the exercise prescribed and completed is essential for study replication in research and translating research findings into the community, and should be prioritised in future trials.
AB - Objectives To update our previous evaluation of the exercise interventions used in randomised controlled trials of breast cancer survivors in relation to (1) the application of the principles of exercise training in the exercise prescription; (2) the reporting of the components of the exercise prescription; and (3) the reporting of adherence of participants to the prescribed interventions. Design Systematic review. Data sources The OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus electronic databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2017. Eligibility criteria Randomised controlled trials of at least 4 weeks of aerobic and/or resistance exercise in women diagnosed with breast cancer, reporting on physical fitness or body composition outcomes. Results Specificity was appropriately applied by 84%, progression by 29%, overload by 38% and initial values by 67% of newly identified studies. Reversibility was reported by 3% anddiminishing returns by 22% of newly identified studies. No studies reported all components of the exercise prescription in the methods, or adherence to the prescribed intervention in the results. Reporting of reversibility has increased from 2010, but no other improvements in reporting were noted from the previous review. Summary/Conclusion No studies of exercise in women with breast cancer attended to all principles of exercise training, or reported all components of the exercise prescription in the methods, or adherence to the prescription in the results. Full reporting of the exercise prescribed and completed is essential for study replication in research and translating research findings into the community, and should be prioritised in future trials.
KW - breast
KW - cancer
KW - exercise training
KW - methodology
KW - review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042331474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042331474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098389
DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098389
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29162619
AN - SCOPUS:85042331474
SN - 0306-3674
VL - 53
SP - 504
EP - 512
JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine
IS - 8
ER -