Abstract
In this paper, we use computer simulation to better understand mixed-initiative dialogues. We compare two models of mixed-initiative: unrestricted initiative, where either participant can take over control at any point; and restricted initiative where one participant keeps control and the other plays a secondary role, but greater than what single-initiative allows. We find that restricted initiative results in similar solution quality as unrestricted, less communication effort, and similar or less reasoning effort. These results agree with our empirical studies on human-human dialogues, in which we find that participants seem to follow the restricted initiative model.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages | 213-216 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| State | Published - 2004 |
| Event | 8th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP 2004 - Jeju, Jeju Island, Korea, Republic of Duration: Oct 4 2004 → Oct 8 2004 |
Other
| Other | 8th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP 2004 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Korea, Republic of |
| City | Jeju, Jeju Island |
| Period | 10/4/04 → 10/8/04 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Using computer simulation to compare two models of mixed-initiative'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS