TY - JOUR
T1 - Using psychometric techniques to improve the balance evaluation systems test
T2 - The mini-bestest
AU - Franchignoni, Franco
AU - Horak, Fay
AU - Godi, Marco
AU - Nardone, Antonio
AU - Giordano, Andrea
PY - 2010/4
Y1 - 2010/4
N2 - Objective: To improve, with the aid of psychometric analysis, the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), a tool designed to analyse several postural control systems that may contribute to poor functional balance in adults. Methods: Performance of the BESTest was examined in a convenience sample of 115 consecutive adult patients with diverse neurological diagnoses and disease severity, referred to rehabilitation for balance disorders. Factor (both explorative and confirmatory) and Rasch analysis were used to process the data in order to produce a new, reduced and coherent balance measurement tool. Results: Factor analysis selected 24 out of the 36 original BESTest items likely to represent the unidimensional construct of "dynamic balance". Rasch analysis was then used to: (/) improve the rating categories, and (ii) delete 10 items (misfitting or showing local dependency). The model consisting of the remaining 14 tasks was verified with confirmatory factor analysis to meet the stringent requirements of modern measurement. Conclusion: The new 14-item scale (dubbed mini-BESTest) focuses on dynamic balance, can be conducted in 10-15 min, and contains items belonging evenly to 4 of the 6 sections from the original BESTest. Further studies are needed to confirm the usefulness of the mini-BESTest in clinical settings.
AB - Objective: To improve, with the aid of psychometric analysis, the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), a tool designed to analyse several postural control systems that may contribute to poor functional balance in adults. Methods: Performance of the BESTest was examined in a convenience sample of 115 consecutive adult patients with diverse neurological diagnoses and disease severity, referred to rehabilitation for balance disorders. Factor (both explorative and confirmatory) and Rasch analysis were used to process the data in order to produce a new, reduced and coherent balance measurement tool. Results: Factor analysis selected 24 out of the 36 original BESTest items likely to represent the unidimensional construct of "dynamic balance". Rasch analysis was then used to: (/) improve the rating categories, and (ii) delete 10 items (misfitting or showing local dependency). The model consisting of the remaining 14 tasks was verified with confirmatory factor analysis to meet the stringent requirements of modern measurement. Conclusion: The new 14-item scale (dubbed mini-BESTest) focuses on dynamic balance, can be conducted in 10-15 min, and contains items belonging evenly to 4 of the 6 sections from the original BESTest. Further studies are needed to confirm the usefulness of the mini-BESTest in clinical settings.
KW - Outcome assessment
KW - Postural balance
KW - Psychometrics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951912499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951912499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2340/16501977-0537
DO - 10.2340/16501977-0537
M3 - Article
C2 - 20461334
AN - SCOPUS:77951912499
SN - 1650-1977
VL - 42
SP - 323
EP - 331
JO - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
JF - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
IS - 4
ER -