TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of the recently developed Total Disability Index
T2 - A single measure of disability in neck and back pain patients
AU - Cruz, Dana L.
AU - Ayres, Ethan W.
AU - Spiegel, Matthew A.
AU - Day, Louis M.
AU - Hart, Robert A.
AU - Ames, Christopher P.
AU - Burton, Douglas C.
AU - Smith, Justin S.
AU - Shaffrey, Christopher I.
AU - Schwab, Frank J.
AU - Errico, Thomas J.
AU - Bess, Shay
AU - Lafage, Virginie
AU - Protopsaltis, Themistocles S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Hart: consulting and personal fees from DePuy, Globus Medical, Medtronic, and Orthofix Inc.; royalties from DePuy, Globus Medical, and SeaSpine; board or committee member of American Orthopaedic Association, Cervical Spine Research Society, North American Spine Society, International Spine Study Group, Scoliosis Research Society, and Western Orthopaedic Association; editorial or governing board of ISSLS textbook The Lumbar Spine; and research support from DePuy and Misonix. Dr. Ames: consultant for DePuy, K2M, Medicrea, Medtronic, Stryker, and Zimmer Biomet; royalties from Zimmer Biomet Spine, DePuy, Next Orthosurgical, NuVasive, Stryker, K2M, and Medicrea; research support from Titan Spine, DePuy Synthes, and ISSG; editorial board of Operative Neurosurgery; grant funding from SRS; executive committee of ISSG; and director of Global Spine Analytics. Dr. Burton: consultant for Bioventus and DePuy; patent holder with and royalties from DePuy and Zimmer Biomet; board or committee member of Scoliosis Research Society; editorial or governing board of Spine Deformity; research support for study described from DePuy; and support of non–study-related research from Pfizer. Dr. Smith: consultant for AlloSource, Cerapedics, K2M, NuVasive, and Zimmer Biomet; royalties from Zimmer Biomet; stock ownership in Alphatec; board or committee member of Cervical Spine Research Society; editorial or governing board of Neurosurgery and Operative Neurosurgery; research support for this study from DePuy Synthes/ISSG; and non–study-related support from AOSpine, DePuy Synthes/ISSG, and NREF. Dr. Shaffrey: consultant for Biomet Spine, Medtronic, NuVasive, Stryker, Siemens, and EOS; patent holder with and royalties from Zimmer Biomet, Medtronic, and NuVasive; direct stock ownership in NuVasive; research support from DePuy, Globus Medical, Medtronic, and NuVasive; board or committee member of Cervical Spine Research Society, AANS, and Neurosurgery RRC; and editorial or governing board for Spine Deformity and Spine. Dr. Schwab: consultant for K2M, Medicrea, Medtronic, NuVasive, Zimmer Biomet, Globus, and MSD; royalties from K2M, Medtronic, and Zimmer Biomet; direct stock ownership in Nemaris; research support from DePuy, NuVasive, and Stryker; board or committee member of Scoliosis Research Society and International Spine Study Group; editorial or governing board of Spine Deformity; speaking/teaching arrangements with Zimmer, Globus, K2M, and MSD; and non–study-related support from DePuy, NuVasive, Globus, Allosource, Orthofix, and SIBone. Dr. Errico: consultant for K2M; royalties from K2M and Fastenetix; research support from K2M; paid presenter/speaker for K2M; and board or committee member of Harms Study Group. Dr. Bess: consultant for AlloSource, DePuy, EOS, K2M, and Misonix; patent holder and royalties from K2M and Pioneer Spine; research support from AlloSource, Biomet Spine, DePuy, EOS, K2M, Medtronic, NuVasive, Orthofix, Inc., and ISSGF; and board or committee member of North American Spine Society and Scoliosis Research Society. Dr. Lafage: consultant for Globus Medical, DePuy, and K2M; direct stock ownership in Nemaris; research support from DePuy, Medtronic, NuVasive, and Stryker; board or committee member of the International Spine Study Group and Scoliosis Research Society; non–study-related support from DePuy Spine, Stryker, and NuVasive (grants paid through ISSGF); and speaking teaching arrangements with DePuy Spine and K2M. Dr. Protopsaltis: consulting and personal fees from Globus Medical, Innovasis, K2M, Medicrea, and NuVasive; and royalties from Altus Spine.
Publisher Copyright:
© AANS 2020.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - OBJECTIVE Neck and back pain are highly prevalent conditions that account for major disability. The Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) are the two most common functional status measures for neck and back pain. However, no single instrument exists to evaluate patients with concurrent neck and back pain. The recently developed Total Disability Index (TDI) combines overlapping elements from the ODI and NDI with the unique items from each. This study aimed to prospectively validate the TDI in patients with spinal deformity, back pain, and/or neck pain. METHODS This study is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a single center. The 14-item TDI, derived from ODI and NDI domains, was administered to consecutive patients presenting to a spine practice. Patients were assessed using the ODI, NDI, and EQ-5D. Validation of internal consistency, test-retest reproducibility, and validity of reconstructed NDI and ODI scores derived from TDI were assessed. RESULTS A total of 252 patients (mean age 55 years, 56% female) completed initial assessments (back pain, n = 115; neck pain, n = 52; back and neck pain, n = 55; spinal deformity, n = 55; and no pain/deformity, n = 29). Of these patients, 155 completed retests within 14 days. Patients represented a wide range of disability (mean ODI score: 36.3 ± 21.6; NDI score: 30.8 ± 21.8; and TDI score: 34.1 ± 20.0). TDI demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.922) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96). Differences between actual and reconstructed scores were not clinically significant. Subanalyses demonstrated TDI's ability to quantify the degree of disability due to back or neck pain in patients complaining of pain in both regions. CONCLUSIONS The TDI is a valid and reliable disability measure in patients with back and/or neck pain and can capture each spine region's contribution to total disability. The TDI could be a valuable method for total spine assessment in a clinical setting, and its completion is less time consuming than that for both the ODI and NDI.
AB - OBJECTIVE Neck and back pain are highly prevalent conditions that account for major disability. The Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) are the two most common functional status measures for neck and back pain. However, no single instrument exists to evaluate patients with concurrent neck and back pain. The recently developed Total Disability Index (TDI) combines overlapping elements from the ODI and NDI with the unique items from each. This study aimed to prospectively validate the TDI in patients with spinal deformity, back pain, and/or neck pain. METHODS This study is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a single center. The 14-item TDI, derived from ODI and NDI domains, was administered to consecutive patients presenting to a spine practice. Patients were assessed using the ODI, NDI, and EQ-5D. Validation of internal consistency, test-retest reproducibility, and validity of reconstructed NDI and ODI scores derived from TDI were assessed. RESULTS A total of 252 patients (mean age 55 years, 56% female) completed initial assessments (back pain, n = 115; neck pain, n = 52; back and neck pain, n = 55; spinal deformity, n = 55; and no pain/deformity, n = 29). Of these patients, 155 completed retests within 14 days. Patients represented a wide range of disability (mean ODI score: 36.3 ± 21.6; NDI score: 30.8 ± 21.8; and TDI score: 34.1 ± 20.0). TDI demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.922) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96). Differences between actual and reconstructed scores were not clinically significant. Subanalyses demonstrated TDI's ability to quantify the degree of disability due to back or neck pain in patients complaining of pain in both regions. CONCLUSIONS The TDI is a valid and reliable disability measure in patients with back and/or neck pain and can capture each spine region's contribution to total disability. The TDI could be a valuable method for total spine assessment in a clinical setting, and its completion is less time consuming than that for both the ODI and NDI.
KW - Back pain
KW - Health-related quality of life
KW - Lumbar
KW - Neck pain
KW - Total Disability Index
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082800556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082800556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3171/2019.9.SPINE19331
DO - 10.3171/2019.9.SPINE19331
M3 - Article
C2 - 31812146
AN - SCOPUS:85082800556
SN - 1547-5654
VL - 32
SP - 533
EP - 541
JO - Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
JF - Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
IS - 4
ER -