Validity of center for epidemiologic studies depression (CES-D) scale in a sample of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans

Ana R. Quiñones, Stephen M. Thielke, Michael E. Clark, Kristin M. Phillips, Christine Elnitsky, Elena M. Andresen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: Optimal depression screening necessitates measurement tools that are valid across varied populations and in the presence of comorbidities. Methods: This study assessed the test properties of two versions of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale against psychiatric diagnoses established by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview among a clinical sample of US Veterans deployed during Operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and New Dawn. Participants (N = 359) recruited from two Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals completed a clinical interview, structured diagnostic interview, and selfreported measures. Results: Based on diagnostic interview and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition criteria, 29.5% of the sample met diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder and 26.5% met diagnostic criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder. Both Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-20 and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-10 scales performed well and almost identically against the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview-major depressive disorder in identifying Veterans with major depressive disorder (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-20 area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve 91%; Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-10 area under the ROC curve 90%). Overall, higher cut points for the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scales performed better in correctly identifying true positives and true negatives for major depressive disorder (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-20 cut point 18+ sensitivity 92% specificity 72%; Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression-10 cut point 10+ sensitivity 92% specificity 69%). Conclusions: The specificity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scales was poor among Veterans with cooccurring post-traumatic stress disorder (13% and 16%). Veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder who have a positive depression screen should have a more thorough assessment of mental health symptoms and comorbidities, rather than immediate diagnosis of and treatment for depression.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSAGE Open Medicine
Volume4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Depression
  • Major depressive disorder
  • Post-traumatic stress disorder
  • Psychometrics
  • Veterans

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of center for epidemiologic studies depression (CES-D) scale in a sample of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this