TY - JOUR
T1 - What is the most effective type of audio-biofeedback for postural motor learning?
AU - Dozza, Marco
AU - Chiari, Lorenzo
AU - Peterka, Robert J.
AU - Wall, Conrad
AU - Horak, Fay B.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Dr. Jesse V. Jacobs and Dr. William G. Wright for inspiring conversations. We also would like to thank Emilie Weed for assistance during the experiments and all of our subjects for donating their time. This study was supported by the NIH grants DC01849 , DC04082 , DC06201 , and AG17960 .
PY - 2011/7
Y1 - 2011/7
N2 - Biofeedback is known to improve postural control and reduce postural sway. However, the effects that different biofeedback modes (coding for more or less complex movement information) may have on postural control improvement are still poorly investigated. In addition, most studies do not take into account the effects of spontaneous motor learning from repetition of a task when investigating biofeedback-induced improvement in postural control. In this study, we compared the effects of four different modes of audio-biofeedback (ABF), including direction and/or magnitude of sway information or just a non-specific-direction alarm, on the postural sway of 13 young healthy adults standing on a continuously rotating surface. Compared to the non-specific-direction alarm, ABF of continuous postural sway direction and/or amplitude resulted in larger postural sway reduction in the beginning of the experiment. However, over time, spontaneous postural motor learning flattened the effects of the different modes of ABF so that the alarm was as effective as more complex information about body sway. Nevertheless, motor learning did not make ABF useless, since all modes of ABF further reduced postural sway, even after subjects learned the task. All modes of ABF resulted in improved multi-segmental control of posture and stabilized the trunk-in-space. Spontaneous motor learning also improved multi-segmental control of posture but not trunk-in-space stabilization as much as ABF. In conclusion, although practice standing on a perturbing surface improved postural stability, the more body sway information provided to subjects using ABF, the greater the additional improvement in postural stability.
AB - Biofeedback is known to improve postural control and reduce postural sway. However, the effects that different biofeedback modes (coding for more or less complex movement information) may have on postural control improvement are still poorly investigated. In addition, most studies do not take into account the effects of spontaneous motor learning from repetition of a task when investigating biofeedback-induced improvement in postural control. In this study, we compared the effects of four different modes of audio-biofeedback (ABF), including direction and/or magnitude of sway information or just a non-specific-direction alarm, on the postural sway of 13 young healthy adults standing on a continuously rotating surface. Compared to the non-specific-direction alarm, ABF of continuous postural sway direction and/or amplitude resulted in larger postural sway reduction in the beginning of the experiment. However, over time, spontaneous postural motor learning flattened the effects of the different modes of ABF so that the alarm was as effective as more complex information about body sway. Nevertheless, motor learning did not make ABF useless, since all modes of ABF further reduced postural sway, even after subjects learned the task. All modes of ABF resulted in improved multi-segmental control of posture and stabilized the trunk-in-space. Spontaneous motor learning also improved multi-segmental control of posture but not trunk-in-space stabilization as much as ABF. In conclusion, although practice standing on a perturbing surface improved postural stability, the more body sway information provided to subjects using ABF, the greater the additional improvement in postural stability.
KW - Biological feedback control systems
KW - Motor learning
KW - Perturbed stance
KW - Posture control
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052408932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052408932&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.05.016
DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.05.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 21703858
AN - SCOPUS:80052408932
SN - 0966-6362
VL - 34
SP - 313
EP - 319
JO - Gait and Posture
JF - Gait and Posture
IS - 3
ER -