TY - JOUR
T1 - Where are Ecology and Biodiversity in Social–Ecological Systems Research? A Review of Research Methods and Applied Recommendations
AU - Rissman, Adena R.
AU - Gillon, Sean
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the National Science Foundation Water Sustainability and Climate project DEB-1038759. We also thank E.G. Booth for design assistance; Ostrom Workshop participants, Stephen R. Carpenter, Sedra Shapiro, and Chloe Wardropper for their input on an earlier draft; and E. Geisler, B. Laursen, A. L'Roe, C. Locke, S. Shapiro, C. Wardropper, and S. Wilkins for research assistance.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright and Photocopying: © 2016 The Authors. Conservation Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Understanding social–ecological systems (SES) is critical for effective sustainability and biodiversity conservation initiatives. We systematically reviewed SES research to examine whether and how it integrates ecological and social domains and generates decision-relevant recommendations. We aim to inform SES research methods and improve the relevance of SES research. Of 120 SES articles, two-thirds included an ecological variable while all but one included a social variable. Biodiversity was a less common ecological variable than resource productivity, land cover, and abiotic measures. We found six diverse social–ecological linking methods: modeling (9%), causal loop diagrams (18%), quantitative correlations (8%), separate quantitative measures (13%), indicators (14%), and rich description (37%). Policy recommendations addressing social–ecological dynamics were more likely in articles including both ecological and social variables, suggesting the importance of research approach for policy and practice application. Further integration of ecology and biodiversity is needed to support governance, policy, and management for SES sustainability.
AB - Understanding social–ecological systems (SES) is critical for effective sustainability and biodiversity conservation initiatives. We systematically reviewed SES research to examine whether and how it integrates ecological and social domains and generates decision-relevant recommendations. We aim to inform SES research methods and improve the relevance of SES research. Of 120 SES articles, two-thirds included an ecological variable while all but one included a social variable. Biodiversity was a less common ecological variable than resource productivity, land cover, and abiotic measures. We found six diverse social–ecological linking methods: modeling (9%), causal loop diagrams (18%), quantitative correlations (8%), separate quantitative measures (13%), indicators (14%), and rich description (37%). Policy recommendations addressing social–ecological dynamics were more likely in articles including both ecological and social variables, suggesting the importance of research approach for policy and practice application. Further integration of ecology and biodiversity is needed to support governance, policy, and management for SES sustainability.
KW - Applied research
KW - interdisciplinary
KW - social–ecological systems
KW - sustainability science
KW - systematic literature review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970007044&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970007044&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/conl.12250
DO - 10.1111/conl.12250
M3 - Letter
AN - SCOPUS:84970007044
SN - 1755-263X
VL - 10
SP - 86
EP - 93
JO - Conservation Letters
JF - Conservation Letters
IS - 1
ER -