A survey of credentialing for ERCP in the United States

Peter B. Cotton, Derek Feussner, Darin Dufault, Gregory Cote

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Aims There are limited data measuring the variability in standards used by hospitals for credentialing physicians to ERCP in the United States. Methods We performed an electronic survey of U.S. gastroenterologists. Results Among 1126 respondents, 21% reported that their hospitals had no written guidelines for initial credentialing, and 59% reported that their hospitals had no written guidelines for repeat credentialing. Among those with guidelines, less than half had any of the criteria recommended by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Conclusions There is an urgent need to improve the credentialing process to enhance practice and to protect patients. An easy-to-use national system for recording and reporting ERCP quality data, like that of the GI Quality Improvement Consortium, is needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)866-869
Number of pages4
JournalGastrointestinal endoscopy
Volume86
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2017
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A survey of credentialing for ERCP in the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this