Academic freedom should be redefined: Point and counterpoint

Tonja M. Woods, W. Renee’ Acosta, Eunice P. Chung, Arthur G. Cox, George A. Garcia, Jamie Ridley Klucken, Marie Chisholm-Burns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

As part of the 2014-15 Academic Leadership Fellows Program, the cohort teams presented debates on topics relevant to academic pharmacy at a public forum during the 2015 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Interim Meeting. The topic of one of the debates was “Academic Freedom Should Be Redefined.” The “point” of the debate focused on important issues such as the fundamental definition of academic freedom as it was written in the 1940 American Association of University Professors’ Statement and the need for redefinition as a consequence of many misunderstandings and misinterpretations that have arisen over time. The “counterpoint” received the greatest support, and it asserted that redefinition is not necessary, but rather the need is to clearly articulate the intended meaning of academic freedom through education, discussion, and by not supporting inappropriate behaviors in the name of “academic freedom.” Reinforced clarity and operational guidance from the academy and academic institutions may add further clarification and may be the best approach to address the concerns related to academic freedom.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number146
JournalAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education
Volume80
Issue number9
StatePublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Academic freedom
  • Academic pharmacy
  • Debate
  • Pharmacy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
  • Pharmacy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Academic freedom should be redefined: Point and counterpoint'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this