Abstract
Syncope is a commonly encountered and challenging problem in medical practice. Presentations are variable, and the causal mechanism often remains elusive even after extensive (and often expensive) evaluation. Clinical practice guidelines have been developed to help guide the multidisciplinary approach necessary to diagnose and manage the broad spectrum of patients presenting with syncope. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, in collaboration with the Heart Rhythm Society, published its first syncope guidelines in 2017. The European Society of Cardiology released the fourth iteration of its syncope guidelines in 2018. This review highlights the differences and congruencies between the 2 sets of recommendations, their implications for clinical practice, the remaining gaps in understanding, and areas of future research.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2410-2423 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Journal of the American College of Cardiology |
Volume | 74 |
Issue number | 19 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 12 2019 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- bifascicular block
- clinical practice guidelines
- electrophysiological study
- implantable loop recorder
- orthostatic hypotension
- permanent pacemaker
- reflex syncope
- syncope
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine