Acceptability of human papillomavirus self-collection and the role of telehealth: a prospective, randomized study stratified by menopausal status

Katherine Fitch, Jacqueline A. Bohn, Jenna B. Emerson, Emily R. Boniface, Amanda Bruegl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective We investigated the utility of telehealth instruction versus mail-based written instruction in facilitating high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) self-collection among post-menopausal patients compared with pre-menopausal patients, as well as the impact on acceptability and feasibility. Methods We conducted a prospective, randomized study of people eligible for cervical cancer screening, stratified by menopausal status, to undergo standard written or telehealth-based instructions for hrHPV self-collection. English speaking individuals residing in Oregon, with a cervix, eligible for primary hrHPV testing, and with access to a video-capable device were included. Patients with prior hysterectomy, trachelectomy, diagnosis of cervical cancer, or pelvic radiation for gynecologic cancer were excluded. We compared preference for and opinions about self-collection and hrHPV test results, by randomization group and stratified by menopausal status using descriptive statistics. Results Among 123 patients enrolled, 61 identified as post-menopausal with a median age of 57 years. While the majority of post-menopausal participants who received telehealth instructions found it helpful, only 6.1% considered telehealth instructions necessary to complete self-testing. There was no difference in opinion of telehealth by menopausal status. Overall, 88.5% of post-menopausal participants preferred self-collection to provider-collection. There were no significant differences between pre- and post-menopausal participants in terms of test preference, discomfort, ease of use, or perceptions of self-collection. Conclusion Telehealth instruction did not add significant value to patients participating in hrHPV self-collection, nor did it alter the acceptability of hrHPV-self collection among an English-speaking cohort. Compared with prior experiences with provider-collected screening, hrHPV self-collection was preferred by both pre- and post-menopausal participants. There were no significant differences in preference for provider- versus self-collection when stratified by menopausal status.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-27
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 14 2023

Keywords

  • Cervical Cancer
  • Gynecology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this