TY - JOUR
T1 - Adalimumab in patients with active noninfectious uveitis
AU - Jaffe, Glenn J.
AU - Dick, Andrew D.
AU - Brézin, Antoine P.
AU - Nguyen, Quan Dong
AU - Thorne, Jennifer E.
AU - Kestelyn, Philippe
AU - Barisani-Asenbauer, Talin
AU - Franco, Pablo
AU - Heiligenhaus, Arnd
AU - Scales, David
AU - Chu, David S.
AU - Camez, Anne
AU - Kwatra, Nisha V.
AU - Song, Alexandra P.
AU - Kron, Martina
AU - Tari, Samir
AU - Suhler, Eric B.
N1 - Funding Information:
(Funded by AbbVie; VISUAL I ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01138657.) Supported by AbbVie. We thank Heather D. Starkey, Ph.D. (Complete Healthcare Communications, Chadds Ford, PA), for assistance with medical writing (funded by AbbVie).
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2016 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/9/8
Y1 - 2016/9/8
N2 - BACKGROUND: Patients with noninfectious uveitis are at risk for long-term complications of uncontrolled inflammation, as well as for the adverse effects of long-term glucocorticoid therapy. We conducted a trial to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab as a glucocorticoid-sparing agent for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis. METHODS: This multinational phase 3 trial involved adults who had active noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis despite having received prednisone treatment for 2 or more weeks. Investigators and patients were unaware of the study-group assignments. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive adalimumab (a loading dose of 80 mg followed by a dose of 40 mg every 2 weeks) or matched placebo. All patients received a mandatory prednisone burst followed by tapering of prednisone over the course of 15 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the time to treatment failure occurring at or after week 6. Treatment failure was a multicomponent outcome that was based on assessment of new inflammatory lesions, best corrected visual acuity, anterior chamber cell grade, and vitreous haze grade. Nine ranked secondary efficacy end points were assessed, and adverse events were reported. RESULTS: The median time to treatment failure was 24 weeks in the adalimumab group and 13 weeks in the placebo group. Among the 217 patients in the intention-to-treat population, those receiving adalimumab were less likely than those in the placebo group to have treatment failure (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.70; P<0.001). Outcomes with regard to three secondary end points (change in anterior chamber cell grade, change in vitreous haze grade, and change in best corrected visual acuity) were significantly better in the adalimumab group than in the placebo group. Adverse events and serious adverse events were reported more frequently among patients who received adalimumab (1052.4 vs. 971.7 adverse events and 28.8 vs. 13.6 serious adverse events per 100 person-years). CONCLUSIONS: In our trial, adalimumab was found to be associated with a lower risk of uveitic flare or visual impairment and with more adverse events and serious adverse events than was placebo.
AB - BACKGROUND: Patients with noninfectious uveitis are at risk for long-term complications of uncontrolled inflammation, as well as for the adverse effects of long-term glucocorticoid therapy. We conducted a trial to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab as a glucocorticoid-sparing agent for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis. METHODS: This multinational phase 3 trial involved adults who had active noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis despite having received prednisone treatment for 2 or more weeks. Investigators and patients were unaware of the study-group assignments. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive adalimumab (a loading dose of 80 mg followed by a dose of 40 mg every 2 weeks) or matched placebo. All patients received a mandatory prednisone burst followed by tapering of prednisone over the course of 15 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the time to treatment failure occurring at or after week 6. Treatment failure was a multicomponent outcome that was based on assessment of new inflammatory lesions, best corrected visual acuity, anterior chamber cell grade, and vitreous haze grade. Nine ranked secondary efficacy end points were assessed, and adverse events were reported. RESULTS: The median time to treatment failure was 24 weeks in the adalimumab group and 13 weeks in the placebo group. Among the 217 patients in the intention-to-treat population, those receiving adalimumab were less likely than those in the placebo group to have treatment failure (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.70; P<0.001). Outcomes with regard to three secondary end points (change in anterior chamber cell grade, change in vitreous haze grade, and change in best corrected visual acuity) were significantly better in the adalimumab group than in the placebo group. Adverse events and serious adverse events were reported more frequently among patients who received adalimumab (1052.4 vs. 971.7 adverse events and 28.8 vs. 13.6 serious adverse events per 100 person-years). CONCLUSIONS: In our trial, adalimumab was found to be associated with a lower risk of uveitic flare or visual impairment and with more adverse events and serious adverse events than was placebo.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986612930&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986612930&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1509852
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1509852
M3 - Article
C2 - 27602665
AN - SCOPUS:84986612930
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 375
SP - 932
EP - 943
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 10
ER -