Adjuvant everolimus after surgery for renal cell carcinoma (EVEREST): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial

Christopher W. Ryan, Catherine M. Tangen, Elisabeth I. Heath, Mark N. Stein, Maxwell V. Meng, Ajjai S. Alva, Sumanta K. Pal, Igor Puzanov, Joseph I. Clark, Toni K. Choueiri, Neeraj Agarwal, Robert G. Uzzo, Naomi B. Haas, Timothy W. Synold, Melissa Plets, Ulka N. Vaishampayan, Brian M. Shuch, Ian M. Thompson, Primo N. Lara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Patients undergoing resection of renal cell carcinoma are at risk of disease relapse. We evaluated the effectiveness of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus administered after surgery. Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we enrolled adults with histologically confirmed renal cell carcinoma who had undergone a full surgical resection and were at intermediate-high or very high risk of recurrence at 398 academic and community institution centres in the USA. After nephrectomy, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a central web-based application using a dynamic balancing algorithm to receive 10 mg oral everolimus daily or placebo for 54 weeks. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival. Efficacy analyses included all eligible, randomly assigned patients; safety analysis included all patients who received treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01120249 and is closed to new participants. Findings: Between April 1, 2011, and Sept 15, 2016, a total of 1545 patients were randomly assigned to receive everolimus (n=775) or placebo (n=770), of whom 755 assigned to everolimus and 744 assigned to placebo were eligible for inclusion in the efficacy analysis. With a median follow-up of 76 months (IQR 61–92), recurrence-free survival was longer with everolimus than with placebo (5-year recurrence-free survival 67% [95% CI 63–70] vs 63% [60–67]; stratified log-rank p=0·050; stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0·85, 95% CI 0·72–1·00; p=0·051) but did not meet the prespecified p value for statistical significance of 0·044. Recurrence-free survival was longer with everolimus than with placebo in the very-high-risk group (HR 0·79, 95% CI 0·65–0·97; p=0·022) but not in the intermediate-high-risk group (0·99, 0·73–1·35; p=0·96). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 343 (46%) of 740 patients who received everolimus and 79 (11%) of 723 who received placebo. Interpretation: Postoperative everolimus did not improve recurrence-free survival compared with placebo among patients with renal cell carcinoma at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy. These results do not support the adjuvant use of everolimus for renal cell carcinoma after surgery. Funding: US National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, National Clinical Trials Network, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, and The Hope Foundation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1043-1051
Number of pages9
JournalThe Lancet
Volume402
Issue number10407
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 23 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adjuvant everolimus after surgery for renal cell carcinoma (EVEREST): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this