An alternative model of maternity care for low-risk birth: Maternal and neonatal outcomes utilizing the midwifery-based birth center model

Jacqueline Wallace, Lauren Hoehn-Velasco, Ellen Tilden, Bryan E. Dowd, Steve Calvin, Diana R. Jolles, Jennifer Wright, Susan Stapleton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To assess key birth outcomes in an alternative maternity care model, midwifery-based birth center care. Data Sources: The American Association of Birth Centers Perinatal Data Registry and birth certificate files, using national data collected from 2009 to 2019. Study Design: This observational cohort study compared key clinical birth outcomes of women at low risk for perinatal complications, comparing those who received care in the midwifery-based birth center model versus hospital-based usual care. Linear regression analysis was used to assess key clinical outcomes in the midwifery-based group as compared with hospital-based usual care. The hospital-based group was selected using nearest neighbor matching, and the primary linear regressions were weighted using propensity score weights (PSWs). The key clinical outcomes considered were cesarean delivery, low birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit admission, breastfeeding, and neonatal death. We performed sensitivity analyses using inverse probability weights and entropy balancing weights. We also assessed the remaining role of omitted variable bias using a bounding methodology. Data Collection: Women aged 16–45 with low-risk pregnancies, defined as a singleton fetus and no record of hypertension or cesarean section, were included. The sample was selected for records that overlapped in each year and state. Counties were included if there were at least 50 midwifery-based birth center births and 300 total births. After matching, the sample size of the birth center cohort was 85,842 and the hospital-based cohort was 261,439. Principal Findings: Women receiving midwifery-based birth center care experienced lower rates of cesarean section (−12.2 percentage points, p < 0.001), low birth weight (−3.2 percentage points, p < 0.001), NICU admission (−5.5 percentage points, p < 0.001), neonatal death (−0.1 percentage points, p < 0.001), and higher rates of breastfeeding (9.3 percentage points, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This analysis supports midwifery-based birth center care as a high-quality model that delivers optimal outcomes for low-risk maternal/newborn dyads.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere14222
JournalHealth Services Research
Volume59
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2024

Keywords

  • birth center
  • community birth
  • low-risk birth
  • maternity care models
  • midwifery-led birth center
  • propensity score weighting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An alternative model of maternity care for low-risk birth: Maternal and neonatal outcomes utilizing the midwifery-based birth center model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this