An ethic of analysis: An argument for critical analysis of research interviews as an ethical practice

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Nursing literature is replete with discussions about the ethics of research interviews. These largely involve questions of method, and how careful study design and data collection technique can render studies more ethical. Analysis, the perennial black box of the research process, is rarely discussed as an ethical practice. In this paper, I introduce the idea that analysis itself is an ethical practice. Specifically, I argue that political discourse analysis of research interviews is an ethical practice. I use examples from my own research in a prison control unit to illustrate what this might look like, and what is at stake.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)84-97
Number of pages14
JournalAdvances in Nursing Science
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Critical theory
  • Discourse theory
  • Ethics
  • Interview
  • Mental illness
  • Political discourse analysis
  • Poststructuralism
  • Prison
  • Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Nursing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An ethic of analysis: An argument for critical analysis of research interviews as an ethical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this