An Examination of History for Promoting Diversity in Neuroscience

M. Angele Theard

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review


Purpose of Review: A review of American history is presented to understand how public policy has contributed to a disproportionate burden of disease in members of underrepresented groups. A review of research conducted in the Stroke Belt provides an opportunity to examine more closely traditional and non-traditional risk factors in an effort to consider strategies for change. Recent Findings: A diverse physician workforce has been offered as a way of improving care for our increasingly diverse populace. Given the expected increased prevalence of stroke in communities of color and the impact of stress from discrimination on health, proactive strategies to promote inclusion and equity to support diversity in perioperative neuroscience is warranted. Summary: Public policy rooted in structural racism has left marginalized groups economically and educationally disadvantaged with less access to health care. Mistrust and fear from ongoing discrimination compels the neuroscience community to broaden their approach for developing a more reassuring and supportive educational environment for patients and trainees.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)202-213
Number of pages12
JournalCurrent Anesthesiology Reports
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 2021


  • Anesthesiology
  • Diversity
  • Education
  • Health disparities
  • Neuroscience
  • Perioperative care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'An Examination of History for Promoting Diversity in Neuroscience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this