TY - JOUR
T1 - An Overview of Cancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Based on the Surrogate End Point of Response Rate
AU - Chen, Emerson Y.
AU - Raghunathan, Vikram
AU - Prasad, Vinay
N1 - Funding Information:
receiving royalties from his book Ending Medical Reversal; is funded by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation; received honoraria for Grand Rounds/ lectures from several universities, medical centers, and professional societies, and payments for contributions to Medscape. Dr Prasad makes the podcast Plenary Session, which has Patreon backers. Dr Chen reports receiving lecture honorarium from Horizon CME. No other disclosures are reported.
Funding Information:
Funding/Support: This study was supported by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/7
Y1 - 2019/7
N2 - Importance: Approximately one-third of cancer drugs are approved based on response rate (RR) - the percentage of patients whose tumors shrink beyond an arbitrary threshold - typically assessed in a single-arm study. Objective: To characterize RR end points used by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for cancer drug approval. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective review of FDA-approved drug indications in oncology from 2006 to 2018. Exposures: Data related to cancer type, line of therapy (first-line, second-line, or third-or-later-line treatment for advanced/metastatic disease), type of FDA approval pathway, trial design, sample size, and level of innovation were extracted. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the RR used as the basis for FDA approval. The secondary outcome was rate of complete response. Results: Eighty-five indications for 59 cancer drugs were identified, 32 (38%) received regular approval, and 53 (62%) were granted accelerated approval. Twenty-nine (55%) accelerated approvals were later converted to regular approval. Of these, 6 (21%) approvals showed overall survival benefit, 16 (55%) later established progression-free survival benefit, and 7 (24%) continued to use RR but gained regular approval. The median RR among the 85 indications was 41% (interquartile range [IQR], 27%-58%). Among them, 14 of 85 (16%) had an RR less than 20%, 28 of 85 (33%) had an RR less than 30%, and 40 of 85 (47%) had an RR less than 40%. The median complete RR for 81 participants was 6% (IQR, 2%-22%). The median sample size among studies leading to approval was 117 (IQR, 76-182; range, 18-1052 participants). Drugs with accelerated approval pending confirmatory data had lower RR compared with drugs that have completed most postmarketing efficacy requirements (median, 28%; IQR, 15%-50% vs median, 42%; IQR, 31%-58%; P =.02). Conclusions and Relevance: Many cancer drugs approved on the basis of response rate offer numerically low or modest response rates. Most premarket studies accrue more than 100 patients. Some of these drugs could potentially be tested in premarket randomized clinical trials measuring directly end points that demonstrate clinical benefit.
AB - Importance: Approximately one-third of cancer drugs are approved based on response rate (RR) - the percentage of patients whose tumors shrink beyond an arbitrary threshold - typically assessed in a single-arm study. Objective: To characterize RR end points used by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for cancer drug approval. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective review of FDA-approved drug indications in oncology from 2006 to 2018. Exposures: Data related to cancer type, line of therapy (first-line, second-line, or third-or-later-line treatment for advanced/metastatic disease), type of FDA approval pathway, trial design, sample size, and level of innovation were extracted. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the RR used as the basis for FDA approval. The secondary outcome was rate of complete response. Results: Eighty-five indications for 59 cancer drugs were identified, 32 (38%) received regular approval, and 53 (62%) were granted accelerated approval. Twenty-nine (55%) accelerated approvals were later converted to regular approval. Of these, 6 (21%) approvals showed overall survival benefit, 16 (55%) later established progression-free survival benefit, and 7 (24%) continued to use RR but gained regular approval. The median RR among the 85 indications was 41% (interquartile range [IQR], 27%-58%). Among them, 14 of 85 (16%) had an RR less than 20%, 28 of 85 (33%) had an RR less than 30%, and 40 of 85 (47%) had an RR less than 40%. The median complete RR for 81 participants was 6% (IQR, 2%-22%). The median sample size among studies leading to approval was 117 (IQR, 76-182; range, 18-1052 participants). Drugs with accelerated approval pending confirmatory data had lower RR compared with drugs that have completed most postmarketing efficacy requirements (median, 28%; IQR, 15%-50% vs median, 42%; IQR, 31%-58%; P =.02). Conclusions and Relevance: Many cancer drugs approved on the basis of response rate offer numerically low or modest response rates. Most premarket studies accrue more than 100 patients. Some of these drugs could potentially be tested in premarket randomized clinical trials measuring directly end points that demonstrate clinical benefit.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066764075&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066764075&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0583
DO - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0583
M3 - Article
C2 - 31135822
AN - SCOPUS:85066764075
SN - 2168-6106
VL - 179
SP - 915
EP - 921
JO - JAMA internal medicine
JF - JAMA internal medicine
IS - 7
ER -