Anesthesia for acute stroke

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

There are many factors that can affect anesthetic management and consequent outcomes for mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke. In this chapter, we review evidence for neuroprotection by specific anesthetic agents and examine the controversy between use of general anesthesia vs. conscious sedation for patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. We contrast the retrospective data suggesting an association between general anesthesia and worse patient outcome, with three salient randomized control studies supporting that modality does not impact patient outcome as long as adequate perfusion is maintained. We conclude the chapter with a summary of current expert consensus regarding preprocedural assessment, intraprocedural physiologic parameters, and postoperative care surrounding patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationEssentials of Evidence-Based Practice of Neuroanesthesia and Neurocritical Care
PublisherElsevier
Pages299-308
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9780128217764
ISBN (Print)9780128218280
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2021

Keywords

  • AnStroke
  • Conscious or moderate sedation
  • Controversy
  • General anesthesia
  • Mechanical thrombectomy
  • Tissue plasminogen activator

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine
  • General Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anesthesia for acute stroke'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this