TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of Job Characteristics and Functional Impairments on Return to Work After ARDS
AU - Su, Han
AU - Thompson, Hilaire J.
AU - May, Susanne
AU - Dinglas, Victor D.
AU - Hough, Catherine L.
AU - Hosey, Megan M.
AU - Hopkins, Ramona O.
AU - Kamdar, Biren B.
AU - Needham, Dale M.
N1 - Funding Information:
FUNDING/SUPPORT: H. S. is supported by The Hester McLaws Dissertation Research Award from University of Washington . This research was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grants N01HR56170 , R01HL091760 , and 3R01HL091760-02S1 along with funding for the ALTA, EDEN, OMEGA and SAILS trials ( NHLBI contracts HHSN268200536165C to HHSN268200536176C and HHSN268200536179C ) and the Hester McLaws Dissertation Research Award.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American College of Chest Physicians
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Background: Joblessness is common after ARDS, but related risk factors are not fully understood. Research Question: What is the association between survivors’ pre-ARDS workload and post-ARDS functional impairment, pain, and fatigue with their return to work (RTW) status? Study Design and Methods: The U.S. Occupational Information Network (O∗NET) was used to determine pre-ARDS workload for participants in the ARDS Network Long-Term Outcomes Study (ALTOS). Post-ARDS functional impairment was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination and SF-36 Physical Functioning, Social Functioning, and Mental Health sub-scales, and categorized as either no impairments, only psychosocial impairment, physical with low psychosocial impairment, or physical with high psychosocial impairment. Post-ARDS pain and fatigue were assessed using the SF-36 pain item and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy—Fatigue Scale fatigue scale, respectively. Generalized linear mixed modeling methods were used to evaluate associations among pre-ARDS workload, post-ARDS functional impairment, and symptoms of pain and fatigue with post-ARDS RTW. Results: Pre-ARDS workload was not associated with post-ARDS RTW. However, as compared with survivors with no functional impairment, those with only psychosocial impairment (OR [CI]: 0.18 [0.06-0.50]), as well as physical impairment plus either low psychosocial impairment (0.08 [0.03-0.22]) or high psychosocial impairment (0.01 [0.003-0.05]) had lower odds of working. Pain (0.06 [0.03-0.14]) and fatigue (0.07 [0.03-0.16]) were also negatively associated with RTW. Interpretation: For previously employed survivors of ARDS, post-ARDS psychosocial and physical impairments, pain, and fatigue were negatively associated with RTW, whereas pre-ARDS workload was not associated. These findings are important for designing and implementing vocational interventions for ARDS survivors.
AB - Background: Joblessness is common after ARDS, but related risk factors are not fully understood. Research Question: What is the association between survivors’ pre-ARDS workload and post-ARDS functional impairment, pain, and fatigue with their return to work (RTW) status? Study Design and Methods: The U.S. Occupational Information Network (O∗NET) was used to determine pre-ARDS workload for participants in the ARDS Network Long-Term Outcomes Study (ALTOS). Post-ARDS functional impairment was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination and SF-36 Physical Functioning, Social Functioning, and Mental Health sub-scales, and categorized as either no impairments, only psychosocial impairment, physical with low psychosocial impairment, or physical with high psychosocial impairment. Post-ARDS pain and fatigue were assessed using the SF-36 pain item and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy—Fatigue Scale fatigue scale, respectively. Generalized linear mixed modeling methods were used to evaluate associations among pre-ARDS workload, post-ARDS functional impairment, and symptoms of pain and fatigue with post-ARDS RTW. Results: Pre-ARDS workload was not associated with post-ARDS RTW. However, as compared with survivors with no functional impairment, those with only psychosocial impairment (OR [CI]: 0.18 [0.06-0.50]), as well as physical impairment plus either low psychosocial impairment (0.08 [0.03-0.22]) or high psychosocial impairment (0.01 [0.003-0.05]) had lower odds of working. Pain (0.06 [0.03-0.14]) and fatigue (0.07 [0.03-0.16]) were also negatively associated with RTW. Interpretation: For previously employed survivors of ARDS, post-ARDS psychosocial and physical impairments, pain, and fatigue were negatively associated with RTW, whereas pre-ARDS workload was not associated. These findings are important for designing and implementing vocational interventions for ARDS survivors.
KW - employment
KW - functional ability
KW - intensive care unit
KW - outcomes
KW - symptom
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111338202&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111338202&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chest.2021.03.008
DO - 10.1016/j.chest.2021.03.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 33727035
AN - SCOPUS:85111338202
SN - 0012-3692
VL - 160
SP - 509
EP - 518
JO - CHEST
JF - CHEST
IS - 2
ER -