TY - JOUR
T1 - Calcimimetics and Bundled Reimbursement
AU - Lin, Eugene
AU - Watnick, Suzanne
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr Lin is supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) through a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases grant: K08DK118213. The NIH had no role in writing or the decision to submit for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - Since 2011, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has provided reimbursement for renal dialysis services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries through a bundled payment system known as the Prospective Payment System. Medications that have no injectable equivalent, known as “oral-only medications,” are currently excluded from the bundle and are paid separately through Medicare Part D. Thus, before the development of etelcalcetide, the first injectable calcimimetic, calcimimetics were reimbursed outside the bundle. Etelcalcetide's introduction and approval for use in Medicare triggered a transition payment for a minimum of 2 years that will eventually result in the incorporation of calcimimetics into the dialysis bundle. Consequently, providers may face incentives to reduce calcimimetic use when the transition period has expired. The complexity of bone-mineral management in conjunction with the paucity of evidence-based recommendations in this area makes it difficult to predict the impact of this transition. Because these medications are expensive, a poor transition could have financial ramifications for dialysis organizations and potentially patient health. To ensure that patients are not adversely affected, it is critical that Medicare incorporate these medications into the bundle carefully, with close monitoring of outcomes.
AB - Since 2011, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has provided reimbursement for renal dialysis services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries through a bundled payment system known as the Prospective Payment System. Medications that have no injectable equivalent, known as “oral-only medications,” are currently excluded from the bundle and are paid separately through Medicare Part D. Thus, before the development of etelcalcetide, the first injectable calcimimetic, calcimimetics were reimbursed outside the bundle. Etelcalcetide's introduction and approval for use in Medicare triggered a transition payment for a minimum of 2 years that will eventually result in the incorporation of calcimimetics into the dialysis bundle. Consequently, providers may face incentives to reduce calcimimetic use when the transition period has expired. The complexity of bone-mineral management in conjunction with the paucity of evidence-based recommendations in this area makes it difficult to predict the impact of this transition. Because these medications are expensive, a poor transition could have financial ramifications for dialysis organizations and potentially patient health. To ensure that patients are not adversely affected, it is critical that Medicare incorporate these medications into the bundle carefully, with close monitoring of outcomes.
KW - Etelcalcetide
KW - Prospective Payment System (PPS)
KW - bone-mineral metabolism
KW - bundle
KW - calcimimetic
KW - dialysis clinic
KW - drug costs
KW - end-stage renal disease (ESRD)
KW - health care incentive
KW - hemodialysis
KW - medical parathyroidectomy
KW - parathyroid hormone (PTH)
KW - payment
KW - reimbursement rate
KW - transition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059342054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059342054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.11.007
DO - 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.11.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 30611600
AN - SCOPUS:85059342054
SN - 0272-6386
VL - 73
SP - 385
EP - 390
JO - American Journal of Kidney Diseases
JF - American Journal of Kidney Diseases
IS - 3
ER -