TY - JOUR
T1 - Cervical, thoracolumbar, and sacral spine trauma classifications
T2 - past, present, and future
AU - Gerges, Christina
AU - Raghavan, Alankrita
AU - Wright, James
AU - Shammassian, Berje
AU - Wright, Christina Huang
AU - Moore, Timothy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Objective: Traumatic spine injuries are a relatively common occurrence and are associated with functional impairment, loss of neurologic function, and spinal deformity. A number of spinal trauma classification systems have been developed with varying degrees of acceptance. This review provides a chronological overview of spinal trauma classification systems, with special consideration towards the benefits and pitfalls related to each. Cervical, thoracolumbar, and sacral trauma classification systems are discussed. Methods: A review of the literature was performed. Published articles that reported on bony spinal trauma classification systems were examined. No year exemptions were identified. The reference lists of all selected articles were screened for additional studies. Article inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined a priori. Results: A total of 20 classification systems were identified from years 1938–2017. Of these 20 classification systems, 6 were cervical, 11 were thoracolumbar and 3 were sacral. The modernization of bony spinal trauma classification has been characterized by the development of weighted scales that include injury morphology, integrity of associated ligamentous structures and neurologic status. Conclusion: For widespread acceptance and adoption in the clinical setting, future spinal trauma scoring classification will need to remain simple, highly reproducible, and impart information with regard to clinical decision-making and prognosis that may be effectively communicated across each medical specialty involved in the care of these patients.
AB - Objective: Traumatic spine injuries are a relatively common occurrence and are associated with functional impairment, loss of neurologic function, and spinal deformity. A number of spinal trauma classification systems have been developed with varying degrees of acceptance. This review provides a chronological overview of spinal trauma classification systems, with special consideration towards the benefits and pitfalls related to each. Cervical, thoracolumbar, and sacral trauma classification systems are discussed. Methods: A review of the literature was performed. Published articles that reported on bony spinal trauma classification systems were examined. No year exemptions were identified. The reference lists of all selected articles were screened for additional studies. Article inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined a priori. Results: A total of 20 classification systems were identified from years 1938–2017. Of these 20 classification systems, 6 were cervical, 11 were thoracolumbar and 3 were sacral. The modernization of bony spinal trauma classification has been characterized by the development of weighted scales that include injury morphology, integrity of associated ligamentous structures and neurologic status. Conclusion: For widespread acceptance and adoption in the clinical setting, future spinal trauma scoring classification will need to remain simple, highly reproducible, and impart information with regard to clinical decision-making and prognosis that may be effectively communicated across each medical specialty involved in the care of these patients.
KW - Spine
KW - cervical
KW - classification
KW - lumbar
KW - thoracic
KW - trauma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089183047&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089183047&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/01616412.2020.1797373
DO - 10.1080/01616412.2020.1797373
M3 - Article
C2 - 32758096
AN - SCOPUS:85089183047
SN - 0161-6412
VL - 45
SP - 877
EP - 883
JO - Neurological Research
JF - Neurological Research
IS - 10
ER -