Clinical Outcomes of a Combined Robotic, Transabdominal, and Open Transperineal Approach for Anastomotic Posterior Urethroplasty

Jaime A. Cavallo, Alex J. Vanni, Geolani W. Dy, Sabrina Stair, Nabeel A. Shakir, David Canes, Lee C. Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Robotic pelvic surgery is being increasingly utilized for reconstruction proximal to the genitourinary diaphragm. We describe a combined robotic, transabdominal, and open transperineal approach for complex anastomotic posterior urethroplasty. Materials and Methods: We performed a multi-institutional retrospective study of patients who underwent anastomotic posterior urethroplasty by a combined robotic, transabdominal, and open transperineal approach between January 2012 and December 2018. Patient demographics; preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical data; and complications were reviewed. Urethroplasty success, de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and de novo erectile dysfunction (ED) were evaluated. Results: Twelve patients were identified with a mean follow-up of 596 (range 73-1618) days. Mean patient age was 65.9 (range 53.4-76.8). Reconstruction required corporal splitting, prostatectomy, and gracilis muscle flap use in one (8.3%), eight (66.7%), and four (33.3%) patients, respectively. Postoperative urinary leak, thromboembolic event, and wound abscess occurred in one (8.3%), one (8.3%), and two (16.7%) patients, respectively. Stenosis recurrence occurred in two patients (16.7%) at a mean 187.5 (20-355) postoperative days. De novo ED and de novo SUI were reported in two (16.7%) and four (33.3%) patients, respectively. Nine patients (75.0%) underwent placement of an artificial urinary sphincter at a mean interval of 359.2 (111-1456) days after the index procedure, with no subsequent erosion. Conclusions: Complex posterior urethroplasty by a combined robotic, transabdominal and open transperineal approach is associated with success and complications rates that are comparable to open techniques and may allow for adjunctive procedures such as prostatectomy. This technique allows for the reconstruction of posterior urethral stenoses that would otherwise have been managed conservatively or with urinary diversion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1372-1377
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume35
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2021

Keywords

  • anastomotic posterior urethroplasty
  • posterior urethral stenosis
  • prostatic urethral stenosis
  • radiation urethral stricture
  • robotic surgery
  • urethral reconstruction
  • urethroplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical Outcomes of a Combined Robotic, Transabdominal, and Open Transperineal Approach for Anastomotic Posterior Urethroplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this