TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of insulin glargine 300 units/mL and 100 units/mL in adults with type 1 diabetes
T2 - Continuous glucose monitoring profiles and variability using morning or evening injections
AU - Bergenstal, Richard M.
AU - Bailey, Timothy S.
AU - Rodbard, David
AU - Ziemen, Monika
AU - Guo, Hailing
AU - Muehlen-Bartmer, Isabel
AU - Ahmann, Andrew J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by the American Diabetes Association.
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare glucose control in participants with type 1 diabetes receiving insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) or glargine 100 units/mL (Gla-100) in the morning or evening, in combination with mealtime insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In this 16-week, exploratory, open-label, parallel-group, two-period crossover study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01658579), 59 adults with type 1 diabetes were randomized (1:1:1:1) to once-daily Gla-300 or Gla-100 given in the morning or evening (with crossover in the injection schedule). The primary efficacy end point was the mean percentage of time in the target glucose range (80-140 mg/dL), as measured using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), during the last 2 weeks of each 8-week period. Additional end points included other CGM glycemic control parameters, hypoglycemia (per self-monitored plasma glucose [SMPG]), and adverse events. RESULTS The percentage of time within the target glucose range was comparable between the Gla-300 and Gla-100 groups. There was significantly less increase in CGMbased glucose during the last 4 h of the 24-h injection interval for Gla-300 compared with Gla-100 (least squares mean difference 214.7 mg/dL [95% CI 226.9 to 22.5]; P = 0.0192). Mean 24-h glucose curves for the Gla-300 group were smoother (lower glycemic excursions), irrespective of morning or evening injection. Four metrics of intrasubject interstitial glucose variability showed no difference between Gla-300 and Gla-100. Nocturnal confirmed (<54 mg/dL by SMPG) or severe hypoglycemia rate was lower for Gla-300 participants than for Gla-100 participants (4.0 vs. 9.0 events per participant-year; rate ratio 0.45 [95% CI 0.24-0.82]). CONCLUSIONS Less increase in CGM-based glucose levels in the last 4 h of the 24-h injection interval, smoother average 24-h glucose profiles irrespective of injection time, and reduced nocturnal hypoglycemia were observed with Gla-300 versus Gla-100.
AB - OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare glucose control in participants with type 1 diabetes receiving insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) or glargine 100 units/mL (Gla-100) in the morning or evening, in combination with mealtime insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In this 16-week, exploratory, open-label, parallel-group, two-period crossover study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01658579), 59 adults with type 1 diabetes were randomized (1:1:1:1) to once-daily Gla-300 or Gla-100 given in the morning or evening (with crossover in the injection schedule). The primary efficacy end point was the mean percentage of time in the target glucose range (80-140 mg/dL), as measured using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), during the last 2 weeks of each 8-week period. Additional end points included other CGM glycemic control parameters, hypoglycemia (per self-monitored plasma glucose [SMPG]), and adverse events. RESULTS The percentage of time within the target glucose range was comparable between the Gla-300 and Gla-100 groups. There was significantly less increase in CGMbased glucose during the last 4 h of the 24-h injection interval for Gla-300 compared with Gla-100 (least squares mean difference 214.7 mg/dL [95% CI 226.9 to 22.5]; P = 0.0192). Mean 24-h glucose curves for the Gla-300 group were smoother (lower glycemic excursions), irrespective of morning or evening injection. Four metrics of intrasubject interstitial glucose variability showed no difference between Gla-300 and Gla-100. Nocturnal confirmed (<54 mg/dL by SMPG) or severe hypoglycemia rate was lower for Gla-300 participants than for Gla-100 participants (4.0 vs. 9.0 events per participant-year; rate ratio 0.45 [95% CI 0.24-0.82]). CONCLUSIONS Less increase in CGM-based glucose levels in the last 4 h of the 24-h injection interval, smoother average 24-h glucose profiles irrespective of injection time, and reduced nocturnal hypoglycemia were observed with Gla-300 versus Gla-100.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019629780&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019629780&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2337/dc16-0684
DO - 10.2337/dc16-0684
M3 - Article
C2 - 28115474
AN - SCOPUS:85019629780
SN - 1935-5548
VL - 40
SP - 554
EP - 560
JO - Diabetes Care
JF - Diabetes Care
IS - 4
ER -