Corrigendum: Sex disparities in substance abuse research: Evaluating 23 years of structural neuroimaging studies (Drug Alcohol Depend. (2017) 173 (92–98) (S0376871617300376) (10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.12.019))

In the above article the figures appeared in the incorrect order. The figures are reproduced below in the correct order. Fig. 1 Article inclusion and exclusion (PRISMA Diagram).[figure presented] Fig. 3 Enrollment by sex and substance use status over time. Top, number of NIH studies and all studies meeting inclusion criteria each year. Second box from top, total number of participants in the literature each year by group and sex. Third box from top, mean number of participants per study per year by group and sex. Bottom box, mean number of participants in NIH-funded studies per study per year by group and sex. Male and female enrollment were significantly different in SUD (p = 0.01) and controls (p = 0.02), with systematically higher enrollment of male participants in both groups over time.[figure presented] Fig. 4 Female to male sampling ratio by substance type. For each study in the sample population, the ratio of total females to males was calculated to form a distribution with cardinality equal to the number of included studies. The top and bottom edges of each box represent the 3rd and 1st quartiles, and lines within the boxes indicate medians. Whiskers above and below each box represent the 90th and 10th percentiles. Statistical outliers are plotted as points.[figure presented] Supplement Fig. S1 PubMed search terms and the critical approach decision flowchart to categorize study evaluation in terms of analytic appropriateness.[figure