TY - JOUR
T1 - Critical care outcomes
T2 - Linking structures, processes, and organizational and clinical outcomes
AU - Mitchell, Pamela H.
AU - Shannon, Sarah E.
AU - Cain, Kevin C.
AU - Hegyvary, Sue T.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1996/9
Y1 - 1996/9
N2 - BACKGROUND: Organizational structure and process are thought to affect patient care outcomes beyond the effects of expert clinical care. OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that a discretionary pattern of organizational structure and process factors is predictive of critical care unit performance, ie, desirable patient and organizational outcomes. METHODS: Quality-of-care patient and organizational outcomes were evaluated in 25 critical care units. A single value representing each critical care unit's euclidian distance from a theoretically ideal pattern of discretionary function was determined and correlated with unit-level measures of outcomes (standardized mortality ratio, severity-adjusted length of stay, patient satisfaction, quality of nursing care, and nursing retention). RESULTS: Distance from the ideal-type discretionary pattern predicted organizational but not clinical outcomes. Units closer to the ideal-type pattern had higher RN retention, and were viewed as better places to work, with higher-quality care by both nurses and physicians. Objectively measured quality of care, patient satisfaction, severity-adjusted mortality, and length of stay were not consistently related to better-structured units. CONCLUSIONS: With experienced critical care practitioners, unit-level structure and process factors were better predictors of organizational outcomes than of clinical outcomes.
AB - BACKGROUND: Organizational structure and process are thought to affect patient care outcomes beyond the effects of expert clinical care. OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that a discretionary pattern of organizational structure and process factors is predictive of critical care unit performance, ie, desirable patient and organizational outcomes. METHODS: Quality-of-care patient and organizational outcomes were evaluated in 25 critical care units. A single value representing each critical care unit's euclidian distance from a theoretically ideal pattern of discretionary function was determined and correlated with unit-level measures of outcomes (standardized mortality ratio, severity-adjusted length of stay, patient satisfaction, quality of nursing care, and nursing retention). RESULTS: Distance from the ideal-type discretionary pattern predicted organizational but not clinical outcomes. Units closer to the ideal-type pattern had higher RN retention, and were viewed as better places to work, with higher-quality care by both nurses and physicians. Objectively measured quality of care, patient satisfaction, severity-adjusted mortality, and length of stay were not consistently related to better-structured units. CONCLUSIONS: With experienced critical care practitioners, unit-level structure and process factors were better predictors of organizational outcomes than of clinical outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030228521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030228521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4037/ajcc1996.5.5.353
DO - 10.4037/ajcc1996.5.5.353
M3 - Article
C2 - 8870859
AN - SCOPUS:0030228521
SN - 1062-3264
VL - 5
SP - 353
EP - 363
JO - American Journal of Critical Care
JF - American Journal of Critical Care
IS - 5
ER -