TY - JOUR
T1 - Current medicolegal and confidentiality issues in large, multicenter research programs
AU - Carney, Patricia A.
AU - Geller, Berta M.
AU - Moffett, Howard
AU - Ganger, Molly
AU - Sewell, Matson
AU - Barlow, William E.
AU - Stalnaker, Nancy
AU - Taplin, Stephen H.
AU - Sisk, Cynthia
AU - Ernster, Virginia L.
AU - Wilkie, Heather A.
AU - Yankaskas, Bonnie
AU - Poplack, Steven P.
AU - Urban, Nicole
AU - West, Michele M.
AU - Rosenberg, Robert D.
AU - Michael, Sharon
AU - Mercurio, Thomas D.
AU - Ballard-Barbash, Rachel
PY - 2000/8/15
Y1 - 2000/8/15
N2 - The convenience of fast computers and the Internet have encouraged large collaborative research efforts by allowing transfers of data from multiple sites to a single data repository; however, standards for managing data security are needed to protect the confidentiality of participants. Through Dartmouth Medical School, in 1996-1998, the authors conducted a medicolegal analysis of federal laws, state statutes, and institutional policies in eight states and three different types of health care settings, which are part of a breast cancer surveillance consortium contributing data electronically to a centralized data repository. They learned that a variety of state and federal laws are available to protect confidentiality of professional and lay research participants. The strongest protection available is the Federal Certificate of Confidentiality, which supersedes state statutory protection, has been tested in court, and extends protection from forced disclosure (in litigation) to health care providers as well as patients. This paper describes the careful planning necessary to ensure adequate legal protection and data security, which must include a comprehensive understanding of state and federal protections applicable to medical research. Researchers must also develop rules or guidelines to ensure appropriate collection, use, and sharing of data. Finally, systems for the storage of both paper and electronic records must be as secure as possible.
AB - The convenience of fast computers and the Internet have encouraged large collaborative research efforts by allowing transfers of data from multiple sites to a single data repository; however, standards for managing data security are needed to protect the confidentiality of participants. Through Dartmouth Medical School, in 1996-1998, the authors conducted a medicolegal analysis of federal laws, state statutes, and institutional policies in eight states and three different types of health care settings, which are part of a breast cancer surveillance consortium contributing data electronically to a centralized data repository. They learned that a variety of state and federal laws are available to protect confidentiality of professional and lay research participants. The strongest protection available is the Federal Certificate of Confidentiality, which supersedes state statutory protection, has been tested in court, and extends protection from forced disclosure (in litigation) to health care providers as well as patients. This paper describes the careful planning necessary to ensure adequate legal protection and data security, which must include a comprehensive understanding of state and federal protections applicable to medical research. Researchers must also develop rules or guidelines to ensure appropriate collection, use, and sharing of data. Finally, systems for the storage of both paper and electronic records must be as secure as possible.
KW - Confidentiality
KW - Legal
KW - Liability
KW - Privacy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034663788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034663788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/aje/152.4.371
DO - 10.1093/aje/152.4.371
M3 - Article
C2 - 10968382
AN - SCOPUS:0034663788
SN - 0002-9262
VL - 152
SP - 371
EP - 378
JO - American Journal of Epidemiology
JF - American Journal of Epidemiology
IS - 4
ER -