TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and content validity of new patient-reported outcome questionnaires to assess the signs and symptoms and impact of atopic dermatitis
T2 - the Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale (ADerm-SS) and the Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (ADerm-IS)
AU - Foley, Catherine
AU - Tundia, Namita
AU - Simpson, Eric
AU - Teixeira, Henrique D.
AU - Litcher-Kelly, Leighann
AU - Bodhani, Amit
N1 - Funding Information:
ES reports grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Eli Lilly and Company, grants and personal fees from Anacor Pharma, Glaxo Smith Kline, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, Pfizer, Leo, and Eli Lilly and Valeant Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Dermira, Galderma, Genentech, Leo Pharma, Menlo Therapeutics, and grants from MedImmune, Novartis, Roivant Sciences, Tioga Pharmaceuticals, Vanda Pharmaceuticals. AB, HDT, and NT are employees of AbbVie Inc. and may own AbbVie stock or stock options. LLK and CF are employed by Adelphi Values LLC, which received payment from AbbVie Inc. to support the research activities presented in this manuscript. Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2019/7/3
Y1 - 2019/7/3
N2 - Objectives: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing skin condition, with signs and symptoms that impact patients’ lives and are best measured from the patient perspective. Therefore, there is a need for AD-specific questionnaires that are consistent with Food and Drug Administration guidance and best measurement practices, assessing sign and symptom severity and associated impacts, to support treatment efficacy in regulated trials. The objectives were to develop patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires assessing sign and symptom severity, as well as impacts of moderate-to-severe adult AD. Methods: A targeted literature review and meetings with clinical experts (dermatologists) were conducted to identify AD-related sign, symptom, and impact concepts. Results were harmonized and used to construct two draft PRO questionnaires: the Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale (ADerm-SS; 11 items) and the Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (ADerm-IS; 10 items). The content validity and questionnaire content were evaluated via qualitative concept elicitation/cognitive debriefing interviews with adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Results: From the literature (n = 13 articles), 13 sign and symptom and 43 impact concepts were identified, while 21 sign and symptom and 48 impacts were elicited from experts (n = 3). During the patient interviews (n = 15), 19 sign and symptom and 41 impact concepts were reported, the majority of which were evaluated by the ADerm-SS and ADerm-IS, thus substantiating the content of both questionnaires. Additionally, patients interpreted both questionnaires as intended by the developers. Conclusions: The ADerm-SS and ADerm-IS can be regarded as content-valid PRO questionnaires for moderate-to-severe AD.
AB - Objectives: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing skin condition, with signs and symptoms that impact patients’ lives and are best measured from the patient perspective. Therefore, there is a need for AD-specific questionnaires that are consistent with Food and Drug Administration guidance and best measurement practices, assessing sign and symptom severity and associated impacts, to support treatment efficacy in regulated trials. The objectives were to develop patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires assessing sign and symptom severity, as well as impacts of moderate-to-severe adult AD. Methods: A targeted literature review and meetings with clinical experts (dermatologists) were conducted to identify AD-related sign, symptom, and impact concepts. Results were harmonized and used to construct two draft PRO questionnaires: the Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale (ADerm-SS; 11 items) and the Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (ADerm-IS; 10 items). The content validity and questionnaire content were evaluated via qualitative concept elicitation/cognitive debriefing interviews with adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Results: From the literature (n = 13 articles), 13 sign and symptom and 43 impact concepts were identified, while 21 sign and symptom and 48 impacts were elicited from experts (n = 3). During the patient interviews (n = 15), 19 sign and symptom and 41 impact concepts were reported, the majority of which were evaluated by the ADerm-SS and ADerm-IS, thus substantiating the content of both questionnaires. Additionally, patients interpreted both questionnaires as intended by the developers. Conclusions: The ADerm-SS and ADerm-IS can be regarded as content-valid PRO questionnaires for moderate-to-severe AD.
KW - Eczema
KW - Impact assessment
KW - Itch
KW - Sleep
KW - Symptom assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060218609&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060218609&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03007995.2018.1560222
DO - 10.1080/03007995.2018.1560222
M3 - Article
C2 - 30561230
AN - SCOPUS:85060218609
SN - 0300-7995
VL - 35
SP - 1139
EP - 1148
JO - Current Medical Research and Opinion
JF - Current Medical Research and Opinion
IS - 7
ER -