TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a Tool to Measure Student Perceptions of Equity and Inclusion in Medical Schools
AU - Boatright, Dowin
AU - Nguyen, Mytien
AU - Hill, Katherine
AU - Berg, David
AU - Castillo-Page, Laura
AU - Anderson, Nientara
AU - Agbelese, Victoria
AU - Venkataraman, Shruthi
AU - Saha, Somnath
AU - Schoenbaum, Stephen C.
AU - Richards, Regina
AU - Jordan, Ayana
AU - Asabor, Emmanuella
AU - White, Marney A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/2/21
Y1 - 2024/2/21
N2 - Importance: Creating an inclusive and equitable learning environment is a national priority. Nevertheless, data reflecting medical students' perception of the climate of equity and inclusion are limited. Objective: To develop and validate an instrument to measure students' perceptions of the climate of equity and inclusion in medical school using data collected annually by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). Design, Setting, and Participants: The Promoting Diversity, Group Inclusion, and Equity tool was developed in 3 stages. A Delphi panel of 9 members identified survey items from preexisting AAMC data sources. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was performed on student responses to AAMC surveys to construct the tool, which underwent rigorous psychometric validation. Participants were undergraduate medical students at Liaison Committee on Medical Education-Accredited medical schools in the US who completed the 2015 to 2019 AAMC Year 2 Questionnaire (Y2Q), the administrations of 2016 to 2020 AAMC Graduation Questionnaire (GQ), or both. Data were analyzed from August 2020 to November 2023. Exposures: Student race and ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status. Main Outcomes and Measures: Development and psychometric validation of the tool, including construct validity, internal consistency, and criterion validity. Results: Delphi panel members identified 146 survey items from the Y2Q and GQ reflecting students' perception of the climate of equity and inclusion, and responses to these survey items were obtained from 54906 students for the Y2Q cohort (median [IQR] age, 24 [23-26] years; 29208 [52.75%] were female, 11389 [20.57%] were Asian, 4089 [7.39%] were multiracial, and 33373 [60.28%] were White) and 61998 for the GQ cohort (median [IQR] age, 27 [26-28] years; 30793 [49.67%] were female, 13049 [21.05%] were Asian, 4136 [6.67%] were multiracial, and 38215 [61.64%] were White). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of student responses identified 8 factors for the Y2Q model (faculty role modeling; student empowerment; student fellowship; cultural humility; faculty support for students; fostering a collaborative and safe environment; discrimination: race, ethnicity, and gender; and discrimination: sexual orientation) and 5 factors for the GQ model (faculty role modeling; student empowerment; faculty support for students; discrimination: race, ethnicity, and gender; and discrimination: sexual orientation). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated acceptable model fit (root mean square error of approximation of 0.05 [Y2Q] and 0.06 [GQ] and comparative fit indices of 0.95 [Y2Q] and 0.94 [GQ]). Cronbach α for individual factors demonstrated internal consistency ranging from 0.69 to 0.92 (Y2Q) and 0.76 to 0.95 (GQ). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that the new tool is a reliable and psychometrically valid measure of medical students' perceptions of equity and inclusion in the learning environment.
AB - Importance: Creating an inclusive and equitable learning environment is a national priority. Nevertheless, data reflecting medical students' perception of the climate of equity and inclusion are limited. Objective: To develop and validate an instrument to measure students' perceptions of the climate of equity and inclusion in medical school using data collected annually by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). Design, Setting, and Participants: The Promoting Diversity, Group Inclusion, and Equity tool was developed in 3 stages. A Delphi panel of 9 members identified survey items from preexisting AAMC data sources. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was performed on student responses to AAMC surveys to construct the tool, which underwent rigorous psychometric validation. Participants were undergraduate medical students at Liaison Committee on Medical Education-Accredited medical schools in the US who completed the 2015 to 2019 AAMC Year 2 Questionnaire (Y2Q), the administrations of 2016 to 2020 AAMC Graduation Questionnaire (GQ), or both. Data were analyzed from August 2020 to November 2023. Exposures: Student race and ethnicity, sex, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status. Main Outcomes and Measures: Development and psychometric validation of the tool, including construct validity, internal consistency, and criterion validity. Results: Delphi panel members identified 146 survey items from the Y2Q and GQ reflecting students' perception of the climate of equity and inclusion, and responses to these survey items were obtained from 54906 students for the Y2Q cohort (median [IQR] age, 24 [23-26] years; 29208 [52.75%] were female, 11389 [20.57%] were Asian, 4089 [7.39%] were multiracial, and 33373 [60.28%] were White) and 61998 for the GQ cohort (median [IQR] age, 27 [26-28] years; 30793 [49.67%] were female, 13049 [21.05%] were Asian, 4136 [6.67%] were multiracial, and 38215 [61.64%] were White). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of student responses identified 8 factors for the Y2Q model (faculty role modeling; student empowerment; student fellowship; cultural humility; faculty support for students; fostering a collaborative and safe environment; discrimination: race, ethnicity, and gender; and discrimination: sexual orientation) and 5 factors for the GQ model (faculty role modeling; student empowerment; faculty support for students; discrimination: race, ethnicity, and gender; and discrimination: sexual orientation). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated acceptable model fit (root mean square error of approximation of 0.05 [Y2Q] and 0.06 [GQ] and comparative fit indices of 0.95 [Y2Q] and 0.94 [GQ]). Cronbach α for individual factors demonstrated internal consistency ranging from 0.69 to 0.92 (Y2Q) and 0.76 to 0.95 (GQ). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that the new tool is a reliable and psychometrically valid measure of medical students' perceptions of equity and inclusion in the learning environment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185619680&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85185619680&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0001
DO - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0001
M3 - Article
C2 - 38381434
AN - SCOPUS:85185619680
SN - 2574-3805
VL - 7
SP - E240001
JO - JAMA Network Open
JF - JAMA Network Open
IS - 2
ER -